Grafts in Dermatologic Surgery: Review and Update on Full- and Split-Thickness Skin Grafts, Free Cartilage Grafts, and Composite Grafts

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 1055-1067 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Adams ◽  
Michael L. Ramsey
2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-296
Author(s):  
Melissa Nantel-Battista ◽  
Christian Murray

Dermatologic surgery procedures can sometimes be time consuming in an office setting. We present a series of tips for dermatologists and dermatologic surgeons that will enhance the efficiency of skin graft procedures. Les interventions en chirurgie dermatologique peuvent parfois prendre beaucoup de temps en cabinet. Seront présentés aux dermatologues et aux chirurgiens dermatologues une serie de conseils qui auront pour effet d'accroître l'efficacité des operations touchant les greffes de peau.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-22
Author(s):  
Nick Marsidi ◽  
Kristin Boteva ◽  
Sofieke A.M. Vermeulen ◽  
Marloes S. van Kester ◽  
Roel E. Genders

Author(s):  
Katherine Hicks ◽  
J. Regan Thomas

Skin grafts may be used for coverage of facial defects in situations in which alternative methods of reconstruction, such as local flaps, are not an option. They may also be beneficial for patients who wish to avoid or who are not good candidates for more complex reconstruction. Full-thickness skin grafts often have a better color and texture match to adjacent skin when compared to split-thickness grafts; however, split-thickness grafts have lower metabolic demand and increased survival rate. Composite grafts may be very useful in the repair of defects with unique contour and support requirements, such as the nasal ala and eyelid. With all grafts, thoughtful planning and sound surgical technique are critical in achieving the best possible functional and aesthetic result.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verónica Olvera-Cortés

Skin grafting is a useful technique that has been used for a very long time for achieving closure of wounds when it cannot occure in a natural conventional manner. There are different types of grafts according to their origin, thickness and form. There are 3 main types of graftsthat are used to cover wounds: Split-thickness skin grafts, full-thickness skin grafts and composite grafts. Each of them has specific indication and has a unique technique for harvesting. If the graft is not taken care of properly its survival can be compromised and necrosis of the graft can occur. Even though complications may present, skin grafting is still considered a practical approach to repair many type of wounds.


2004 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 612-614
Author(s):  
Yukiko TERAMOTO ◽  
Makoto ICHIMIYA ◽  
Yuko TAKITA ◽  
Yoshiaki YOSHIKAWA ◽  
Masahiko MUTO

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S190-S191
Author(s):  
Joshua Frost ◽  
Nathan Hallier ◽  
Tanir Moreno ◽  
Jared Covell ◽  
Ryan Keck ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction A critical component of split-thickness skin grafting is the fixation of the skin graft to the wound site. Graft displacement can result in graft failure, especially during the initial 48–72 hours following application. The most common method of securing grafts is with the use of staples, sometimes with the addition of fibrin glue in order to aid both graft adhesion and homeostasis. The use of staples, however, is associated with significant levels of patient discomfort, especially during staple removal. A possible alternative to staples is the use of liquid adhesives, in combination with steri-strips, to anchor the edges of skin grafts to intact skin. Certain liquid adhesives, such as gum-based resins, are cheaper to use than staples and offer the potential to secure small split-thickness skin grafts without the associated pain of staples. In this pilot study, we examined the effectiveness of using a combination of gum-based resin (Gum Mastic-Storax-Msal-Alcohol), fibrin glue, and steri-strips to secure partial-thickness grafts in 8 patients without the use of staples or sutures. Methods Patients were included in the study who required split-thickness skin grafts to treat wounds involving less than or equal to 15% total surface body area and whose wounds were not located in areas prone to graft displacement, such as the axilla and groin. For each patient, skin grafts were secured using fibrin glue (sprayed over the entire wound), and a combination of liquid adhesive and steri-strips applied around the wound perimeter. The success of each graft was determined by the percentage of graft take. Results From January 1st, 2020 to April 30th, 2020, 8 patients were identified who fit the inclusion criteria. Five of the patients received grafts to their lower extremities, two patients received grafts to their upper extremities, and one of the patients received a graft to the torso. The average wound site that was grafted was 116.7 cm2. Average graft take among the 8 patients was 96.9%, with a range of 90%-100%. No complications at the graft site were noted, such as hematomas or any other event that resulted in graft displacement or failure. Conclusions The results of the study demonstrate that a combination of liquid adhesive, fibrin glue, and steri-strips, can be used as an effective alternative to staples in small split-thickness skin grafts. The use of liquid adhesive in place of staples was advantageous because it eliminated to need for staple removal, which resulted in less discomfort for the patient and less work for the nursing staff.


2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 1707-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy R. Brackeen ◽  
Michael J. Wells ◽  
Jeff M. Freed

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document