Effectiveness of Exercise versus Normal Activity on Acute Low Back Pain: An Integrative Synthesis and Meta-Analysis

Author(s):  
Kathy McLain ◽  
Catherine Powers ◽  
Penny Thayer ◽  
Rosalee J. Seymour
Spine ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (14) ◽  
pp. 1487-1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Rozenberg ◽  
Cécile Delval ◽  
Yvonne Rezvani ◽  
Nicole Olivieri-Apicella ◽  
Jean-Louis Kuntz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boyu Wu ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
Chengwei Fu ◽  
Gonghui Jian ◽  
Yue Zhuo ◽  
...  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystian B Oliveira ◽  
Melanie Hamilton ◽  
Adrian Traeger ◽  
Rachelle Buchbinder ◽  
Bethan Richards ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction There is a common belief that patients presenting to emergency departments have more severe pain levels and functional limitations than those who are seen in general practice. The aim of this systematic review was to compare pain and disability levels of patients with acute low back pain presenting to general practice vs those presenting to emergency departments. Methods Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from database inception to February 2019. Observational studies including patients with acute non-specific low back pain presenting to emergency departments and/or general practice were eligible. Pain and/or disability scores expressed on a 0–100 scale were the primary outcomes. Risk of bias was evaluated with a validated tool for observational studies, and the overall quality of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Meta-analysis with random effects and meta-regression were used to test for differences between the two settings. Results We included 12 records reporting results for 10 unique studies with a total of 6,999 participants from general practice (n = 6) and emergency departments (n = 4). There was low-quality evidence (downgraded for indirectness and inconsistency) that patients presenting to emergency departments had higher pain scores than those in general practice, with a mean difference of 17.3 points (95% confidence interval: 8.8 to 25.9 on a 0–100 scale). Similarly, there was low-quality evidence (downgraded for indirectness and inconsistency) that patients presenting to emergency departments had higher disability scores than those in general practice (mean difference: 21.7; 95% confidence interval: 4.6 to 38.7 on a 0–100 scale). Conclusion Patients with acute non-specific low back pain presenting to emergency departments may report higher levels of pain and disability than those seen in general practice.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Abdel Shaheed ◽  
Christopher G. Maher ◽  
Kylie A. Williams ◽  
Andrew J. McLachlan

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (22.2) ◽  
pp. 119-138
Author(s):  
Zainab Samaan

Background: Acute low back pain (ALBP) is a common clinical complaint that can last anywhere from 24 hours to 12 weeks. In recent years, there has been an opioid epidemic which is linked to the increased availability of prescription opioids. Though guidelines recommend that in the treatment of ALBP, opioids should be used when other treatments fail, we have seen an increase in opioid prescriptions for ALBP. With this crisis, it is important to examine if there are any adverse outcomes associated with prescribing opioids for ALBP. Objective: We aim to review the published literature to examine the adverse outcomes associated with opioid use for ALBP. Study Design: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis in accordance with our published protocol and PRISMA guidelines. Setting: The review was conducted at McMaster University. Methods: Various electronic databases for articles published from inception to September 30, 2017, inclusive. Both randomized clinical trials and observational studies on the impact of opioid use in ALBP in the adult population were included. Eight pairs of independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality. The identified articles were assessed for risk of bias using sensitivity analysis. Trials with comparative outcomes were reported in a meta-analysis using a fixed effects model. Results: A total of 13,889 studies were initially screened for the review and a total of 4 studies were included in the full review, of which 2 studies were meta-analyzed. Our results showed that prescribing opioids for ALBP was significantly associated with longterm continued opioid use (1.57, 95% CI, 1.06-2.33). There was no significant association found between unemployment duration and prescribing opioids for ALBP (3.54, 95% CI, -7.57 to 14.66). Limitations: Due to the limited number of studies that considered unemployment, only an unpooled analysis was conducted. Among the included studies there was both statistical and clinical heterogeneity due to differences in methodology, study design, risk of selection or performance bias. Most of the studies had an unclear or high risk of bias and poorly defined side effects. Conclusions: Due to the lack of literature examining long-term adverse outcomes associated with prescribing opioids for ALBP, no definitive conclusions can be made. However, with the literature available, there does seem to be risk associated with prescribing opioids for ALBP so there is a great need to conduct further investigations examining these adverse outcomes for ALBP patients. Key words: Acute low back pain, opioids, prescriptions, low back pain, long-term use, opioid use disorder


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 49-49
Author(s):  
Xuan Su ◽  
Hong Qian ◽  
Biyu Chen ◽  
Wenjuan Fan ◽  
Danghan Xu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document