scholarly journals A phylogeny of the genusNocardiadeduced from the analysis of small-subunit ribosomal DNA sequences, including transfer ofNocardia amaraeto the genusGordonaasGordona amaraecomb. nov.

1994 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Ruimy ◽  
Patrick Boiron ◽  
Valérie Boivin ◽  
Richard Christen
Nematology ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 699-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Mullin ◽  
Timothy Harris ◽  
Thomas Powers

AbstractThe systematic position of Campydora Cobb, 1920, which possesses many unique morphological features, especially in pharyngeal structure and stomatal armature, has long been a matter of uncertainty with the 'position of the Campydorinae' (containing only Campydora) being questionable. A review of the morphology of C. demonstrans, the only nominal species of Campydora concluded that the species warranted placement as the sole member of a monotypic suborder, Campydorina, in the order Dorylaimida. Others placed Campydorina in the order Enoplida. We conducted phylogenetic analyses, using 18s small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences generated from a number of taxa in the subclasses Enoplia and Dorylaimia, to evaluate these competing hypotheses. Although precise taxonomic placement of the genus Campydora and the identity of its closest living relatives is in need of further investigation, our analyses, under maximum parsimony, distance, and maximum likelihood criteria, unambiguously indicate that Campydora shares a common, more recent, ancestry with genera such as Alaimus, Pontonema, Tripyla and Ironus (Enoplida), rather than with any members of Dorylaimida, Mononchida or Triplonchida.


2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweł CZARNOTA ◽  
Beata GUZOW-KRZEMIŃSKA

AbstractThe phylogeny of the Micarea prasina group was investigated using mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences from 14 taxa representing this group, four other members of the genus Micarea, and Psilolechia lucida as an outgroup. A total of 31 new mtSSU rDNA sequences were generated, including 10 from the M. micrococca complex. Bayesian, maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods were used to analyse the data. The results show that M. micrococca is not monophyletic and forms three strongly supported lineages: 1) M. micrococca s. str., 2) M. byssacea (Th. Fr.) Czarnota, Guzow-Krzemińska & Coppins comb. nov., and 3) a putative taxon that requires further studies. Micarea viridileprosa is a sister species to M. micrococca s. str. and the recently described M. nowakii is a sister species to M. prasina s. str. The placement of M. tomentosa within the M. prasina group is confirmed. Micarea hedlundii appears to be more closely related to the M. micrococca complex than M. prasina s. str. Descriptions, illustrations, taxonomic remarks, distribution and habitat data for M. micrococca s. str. and M. byssacea are provided. A lectotype for Biatora byssacea Hampe non Zwackh and a neotype for Catillaria prasina β [var.] byssacea are selected.


1999 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Min Boo ◽  
Wook Jae Lee ◽  
Hwan Su Yoon ◽  
Atsushi Kato ◽  
Hiroshi Kawai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document