Esthetic Arch Bar for Maxillomandibular Fixation in Orthognathic Surgery

1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (s1) ◽  
pp. 35-37
Author(s):  
Fun-Chee Loh ◽  
Kenneth K.K. Lew ◽  
Chee-Hwee Sim
Keyword(s):  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Maxillomandibular Fixation ◽  
Arch Bar

scholarly journals Comparison of Efficacy of Transalveolar Screws and Conventional Dental Wiring Using Erich Arch Bar for Maxillomandibular Fixation in Mandibular Fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-217
Author(s):  
Yashmeet Kaur Sandhu ◽  
Sarfaraz Padda ◽  
Tejinder Kaur ◽  
Amit Dhawan ◽  
Sarika Kapila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Maxillomandibular Fixation ◽  
Arch Bar

An Alternative to Arch-Bar Maxillomandibular Fixation

1997 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 1758-1759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasiliki Karlis ◽  
Robert Glickman
Keyword(s):  
Maxillomandibular Fixation ◽  
Arch Bar

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of the Embrasure Wire versus Arch Bar Maxillomandibular Fixation in the Management of Mandibular Fractures: Are Arch Bars Replaceable?

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-123
Author(s):  
Sanjay Rastogi ◽  
Tousif Ahmed ◽  
Kolli Giri ◽  
Ramakant Dandriyal ◽  
Indra B. Niranjana Prasad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Intermaxillary Fixation ◽  
Maxillomandibular Fixation ◽  
Arch Bar ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

The aim of this prospective study was to appraise the role of embrasure wiring in the treatment of mandibular fractures over the arch bar as adjunctive techniques of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). This study was conducted on 40 patients who were surgically treated for mandibular fractures with accessory use of MMF (embrasure: group A vs. arch bars: group B). All patients were evaluated for demographic data, etiology, and location of fracture. Characteristically, the complications, including wire injury, infection, and malocclusion, were recorded. The data were analyzed using Student's t-test and chi-square test as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05). In this study, data from 40 patients were included. In group A (embrasure wiring), time required for placement of MMF was significantly less than (7.85 ± 0.81 minutes) that in group B, and also there was less incidence of wire prick to the operator in group A than in group B ( p < 0.05). However, in terms of wire prick and malocclusion, no statistically significant difference was noted in groups A and B ( p > 0.05). Patient treated with embrasure wiring intermaxillary fixation had better outcomes especially in terms of time of placement and less incidence of wire prick injury when compared with arch bar.

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BI-CORTICAL SCREWS V/S ERICH’S ARCH BAR FOR MAXILLOMANDIBULAR FIXATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 448-457
Author(s):  
AMIT KUMAR SHARMA ◽  
AKSHAT GUPTA ◽  
NILESH ODEDRA ◽  
CHETNA GABHANE ◽  
HEMANG PABARI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Maxillomandibular Fixation ◽  
Arch Bar

scholarly journals Assessment of the Relationship Between the Recovery of Maximum Mandibular Opening and the Maxillomandibular Fixation Period After Orthognathic Surgery

2008 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 486-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichiro Ueki ◽  
Kohei Marukawa ◽  
Yukari Hashiba ◽  
Kiyomasa Nakagawa ◽  
Kagan Degerliyurt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Maxillomandibular Fixation ◽  
The Relationship
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document