scholarly journals Dementia care mapping to support staff in the care of people with intellectual disability and dementia: a feasibility study

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1071-1082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feija D. Schaap ◽  
Andrea S. Fokkens ◽  
Geke J. Dijkstra ◽  
Sijmen A. Reijneveld ◽  
Evelyn J. Finnema
Pflege ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (01) ◽  
pp. 0067-0067
Author(s):  
Christina Anthea

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolinda Douglass ◽  
Arlene Keddie ◽  
Dawn Brooker ◽  
Claire Surr

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1993-2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Nikolaus Dichter ◽  
Diana Trutschel ◽  
Christian Günter Georg Schwab ◽  
Burkhard Haastert ◽  
Tina Quasdorf ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackground:The Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) method is an internationally recognized complex intervention in dementia research and care for implementing person-centered care. The Leben-QD II trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of DCM with regard to caregivers.Methods:The nine participating nursing home units were allocated to three groups: (1) DCM method experienced ≥ 1 year, (2) DCM newly introduced during this trial, and (3) regular rating of residents’ quality of life (control group). Linear mixed models were fit to cluster-aggregated data after 0, 6, and 18 months, adjusting for repeated measurements and confounders. The primary outcome was the Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (ADQ) score; the secondary outcomes were the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI).Results:The analysis included 201 caregivers with 290 completed questionnaires (all three data collection time points). The ADQ showed a significant time and time*intervention effect. At baseline, the estimated least-square means for the ADQ were 71.98 (group A), 72.46 (group B), and 71.15 (group C). The non-linear follow-up of group A indicated an estimated-least square means of 69.71 (T1) and 68.97 (T2); for group B, 72.80 (T1) and 72.29 (T2); and for group C, 66.43 (T1) and 70.62 (T2).Conclusions:The DCM method showed a tendency toward negatively affecting the primary and secondary outcomes; this finding could be explained by the substantial deviation in adherence to the intervention protocol.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document