scholarly journals Systematic review of applied usability metrics within usability evaluation methods for hospital electronic healthcare record systems

Author(s):  
Marta Weronika Wronikowska ◽  
James Malycha ◽  
Lauren J. Morgan ◽  
Verity Westgate ◽  
Tatjana Petrinic ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
pp. 613-636
Author(s):  
Ana Isabel Martins ◽  
Alexandra Queirós ◽  
Anabela G. Silva ◽  
Nelson Pacheco Rocha

This chapter aims to identify, analyze, and classify the methodologies and methods described in the literature for the usability evaluation of systems and services based on information and communication technologies. The methodology used was a systematic review of the literature. The studies included in the analysis were classified into empirical and analytical methodologies (test, inquiry, controlled experiment, or inspection). A total of 2116 studies were included, of which 1308 were classified. In terms of results, the inquiry methodology was the most frequent in this review, followed by test, inspection, and finally, the controlled experiment methodology. A combination of methodologies is relatively common, especially the combination of test and inquiry methodologies, probably because they assess different but complementary aspects of usability contributing to a more comprehensive assessment.


Author(s):  
Ana Isabel Martins ◽  
Alexandra Queirós ◽  
Anabela G. Silva ◽  
Nelson Pacheco Rocha

This chapter aims to identify, analyze, and classify the methodologies and methods described in the literature for the usability evaluation of systems and services based on information and communication technologies. The methodology used was a systematic review of the literature. The studies included in the analysis were classified into empirical and analytical methodologies (test, inquiry, controlled experiment, or inspection). A total of 2116 studies were included, of which 1308 were classified. In terms of results, the inquiry methodology was the most frequent in this review, followed by test, inspection, and finally, the controlled experiment methodology. A combination of methodologies is relatively common, especially the combination of test and inquiry methodologies, probably because they assess different but complementary aspects of usability contributing to a more comprehensive assessment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. e17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Winckler Simor ◽  
Manoela Rogofski Brum ◽  
Jaison Dairon Ebertz Schmidt ◽  
Rafael Rieder ◽  
Ana Carolina Bertoletti De Marchi

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés Solano ◽  
César A. Collazos ◽  
Cristian Rusu ◽  
Habib M. Fardoun

Usability is a fundamental quality characteristic for the success of an interactive system. It is a concept that includes a set of metrics and methods in order to obtain easy-to-learn and easy-to-use systems. Usability Evaluation Methods, UEM, are quite diverse; their application depends on variables such as costs, time availability, and human resources. A large number of UEM can be employed to assess interactive software systems, but questions arise when deciding which method and/or combination of methods gives more (relevant) information. We proposeCollaborative Usability Evaluation Methods, CUEM, following the principles defined by the Collaboration Engineering. This paper analyzes a set of CUEM conducted on different interactive software systems. It proposes combinations of CUEM that provide more complete and comprehensive information about the usability of interactive software systems than those evaluation methods conducted independently.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document