scholarly journals MR Intracranial Vessel Wall Imaging: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae W. Song ◽  
Brianna F. Moon ◽  
Morgan P. Burke ◽  
Srikant Kamesh Iyer ◽  
Mark A. Elliott ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 78 (10) ◽  
pp. 642-650
Author(s):  
Felipe Torres PACHECO ◽  
Luiz Celso Hygino da CRUZ JUNIOR ◽  
Igor Gomes PADILHA ◽  
Renato Hoffmann NUNES ◽  
Antônio Carlos Martins MAIA JUNIOR ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Intracranial vessel wall imaging plays an increasing role in diagnosing intracranial vascular diseases. With the growing demand and subsequent increased use of this technique in clinical practice, radiologists and neurologists should be aware of the choices in imaging parameters and how they affect image quality, clinical indications, methods of assessment, and limitations in the interpretation of these images. Due to the improvement of the MRI techniques, the possibility of accurate and direct evaluation of the abnormalities in the arterial vascular wall (vessel wall imaging) has evolved, adding substantial data to diagnosis when compared to the indirect evaluation based on conventional flow analyses. Herein, the authors proposed a comprehensive approach of this technique reinforcing appropriated clinical settings to better use intracranial vessel wall imaging.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 1452-1459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zihao Zhang ◽  
Zhaoyang Fan ◽  
Qingle Kong ◽  
Jiayu Xiao ◽  
Fang Wu ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 286 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arjen Lindenholz ◽  
Anja G. van der Kolk ◽  
Jaco J. M. Zwanenburg ◽  
Jeroen Hendrikse

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Serdar Arslan ◽  
Bora Korkmazer ◽  
Osman Kizilkilic

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weston Langdon ◽  
Manus J. Donahue ◽  
Anja Gwendolyn Van der Kolk ◽  
Swati Rane ◽  
Megan K Strother

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Jin Cho ◽  
Byung Se Choi ◽  
Yun Jung Bae ◽  
Sung Hyun Baik ◽  
Leonard Sunwoo ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the pooled proportion of image findings of acute to subacute craniocervical arterial dissection (AD) direct signs on magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging (MR-VWI) and to identify factors responsible for the heterogeneity across the included studies.Methods: A systematic literature search in the Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed for studies published on the relevant topic before April 14, 2020. Pooled sensitivity and specificity values and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using bivariate random-effects modeling. Meta-regression analyses were also performed to determine factors influencing heterogeneity.Results: Eleven articles with data for 209 patients with acute to subacute craniocervical AD who underwent MR-VWI were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The most common findings on MR-VWI were wall hematoma (84%; 95% CI, 71%−92%), abnormal enhancement (72%; 95% CI, 49%−88%), aneurysmal dilatation (71%, 95% CI, 53%−84%), and intimal flap or double lumen signs (49%; 95% CI, 29%−71%). Among the potential covariates of heterogeneity, the presence of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) within the MR-VWI sequence combination significantly affected the pooled proportion of the intimal flap or double lumen signs.Conclusion: Wall hematoma and intimal flap or double lumen signs were the most common and least common direct sign image findings, respectively, on MR-VWI in patients with acute to subacute craniocervical AD. Furthermore, the absence of CE-T1WI in MR-VWI protocol was the cause of heterogeneity for the detection of the intimal flap or double lumen signs. This data may help improve MR-VWI interpretation and enhance the understanding of the radiologic diagnosis of craniocervical AD.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 2996-3004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja G. van der Kolk ◽  
Jeroen Hendrikse ◽  
Manon Brundel ◽  
Geert J. Biessels ◽  
Ewoud J. Smit ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document