Review for "Changes in glycated haemoglobin, diabetes knowledge, quality of life and anxiety in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes attending summer camps: a systematic review and meta‐analysis"

Author(s):  
Jeff Hitchcock
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 340-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Keller ◽  
Radhouène Attia ◽  
Jacques Beltrand ◽  
Juliette Djadi-Prat ◽  
Thao Nguyen-Khoa ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo H. R. F. Almeida ◽  
Thales B. C. Silva ◽  
Francisco de Assis Acurcio ◽  
Augusto A. Guerra Júnior ◽  
Vania E. Araújo ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelli J. O’Neil ◽  
Satya S. Jonnalagadda ◽  
Barbara L. Hopkins ◽  
Jana R. Kicklighter

2022 ◽  
pp. 263501062110702
Author(s):  
Patricia Davidson ◽  
Jacqueline LaManna ◽  
Jean Davis ◽  
Maria M. Ojeda ◽  
Suzanne Hyer ◽  
...  

Purpose: It is well documented that chronic conditions, such as diabetes, impact quality of life (QoL). QoL assessment is essential when developing and evaluating diabetes self-management education support interventions. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence and gaps in the research and the impact of diabetes self-management education (DSME) on QoL outcomes in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Methods A systematic review of English language studies published between January 1, 2007, and March 31, 2020, was conducted using a modified Cochrane review method. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), participants had T1DM with or without caregivers, a DSME intervention alone or a component(s) of the ADCES7™ Self-Care Behaviors was described, and QoL was a primary or secondary outcome. A 3-tiered review process was utilized for selecting articles. Retained articles were assessed for risk of bias. Results: Nineteen articles, reporting on 17 RCTs, met inclusion criteria, of which 7 studies reported QoL as the primary outcome and 10 as a secondary outcome. Seven studies detected significant impact of DMSE on QoL outcomes in either the participants or family caregivers, which varied in participant populations, selection of QoL tools (generic vs diabetes-specific), intervention type, intervention length, and type of interventionist. Conclusion: DSME has the potential to influence QoL outcomes in people with T1DM. Research using more standardized methods are needed to delineate impact on a broader range of factors that influence QoL for those living with T1DM across the life span and their caregivers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document