scholarly journals P8‐156: A case of thymic cancer treated with chemotherapy of S‐1

Respirology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (S3) ◽  
pp. 349-349
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 115 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Young Huh ◽  
Seong-Hoon Shin ◽  
Meyung Kug Kim ◽  
So-Young Lee ◽  
Ki Hun Son ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012050
Author(s):  
Shahar Shelly ◽  
John R Mills ◽  
Divyansu Dubey ◽  
Andrew McKeon ◽  
Anastasia Zekeridou ◽  
...  

Objective:To critically assess the clinical utility of striational antibodies (StrAbs) within paraneoplastic and myasthenia gravis serological evaluations.Methods:All Mayo Clinic patients tested for StrAbs from January 1st 2012-December 31st 2018 utilizing Mayo’s Unified Data Platform (UDP) were reviewed for neurological diagnosis and cancer.Results:38,502 unique paraneoplastic and 1,899 MG patients were tested. In paraneoplastic evaluations, the StrAbs positivity rate was higher in cancer vs without cancer (5% [321/6775] vs 4% [1154/31727]; p<0.0001; OR 1.35; CI=1.19-1.53) but ROC analysis indicated no diagnostic accuracy in cancer (AUC=0.505). No neurological phenotype was significantly associated with StrAbs in the paraneoplastic group. Positivity was more common in all MG cancers compared to paraneoplastic cancers (p<0.0001). In MG evaluations, the StrAbs positivity rate was higher in those with cancer vs without (46% [217/474] vs 26% [372/1425]; p<0.0001; OR 2.39, CI 1.9-2.96) with ROC analysis indicating poor diagnostic accuracy for thymic cancer (AUC 0.634, recommended cutoff=1:60, sensitivity=56%, specificity=71%), with worse accuracy for extrathymic cancers (AUC 0.543). In paraneoplastic or MG evaluations, the value of antibody positivity did not improve cancer predictions. Paraneoplastic evaluated patients were more likely with positive StrAbs to obtain computed tomography (CT) (p=0.0001) with 3% (12/468) cancer found.Conclusion:Despite a statistically significant association with cancer, an expansive review of performance in clinical service demonstrates that StrAbs are neither specific nor sensitive in predicting malignancy or neurological phenotypes. CT imaging is over utilized with positive StrAbs results. Removal of StrAbs from paraneoplastic or MG evaluations will improve the diagnostic characteristics of the current MG test.Classification of Evidence:This study provides Class II evidence that the presence of StrAbs do not accurately identify patients with malignancy or neurological phenotypes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Álvarez-Quilón ◽  
José Terrón-Bautista ◽  
Irene Delgado-Sainz ◽  
Almudena Serrano-Benítez ◽  
Rocío Romero-Granados ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keitarou Matsumoto ◽  
Tsutomu Tagawa ◽  
Akihiro Nakamura ◽  
Naoya Yamasaki ◽  
Tomoyuki Shirafuji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 605-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiya Fujiwara ◽  
Kouta Araki ◽  
Hitoshi Nishikawa ◽  
Kazutoshi Kotani ◽  
Motoki Matsuura

2001 ◽  
Vol 248 (11) ◽  
pp. 1000-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla D'Avino ◽  
Marco Lucchi ◽  
Roberto Ceravolo ◽  
Alfredo Mussi ◽  
Alessandro Malandrini ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. S926-S927
Author(s):  
Harleen K. Chela ◽  
Mary Mikhael ◽  
Omer Basar ◽  
Feng Yin ◽  
Veysel Tahan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document