Risk Assessment and Risk Governance of Liquefied Natural Gas Development in Gladstone, Australia

Risk Analysis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 1830-1846 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. van der Vegt
2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Elsayed ◽  
Khaled Marghany ◽  
Said Abdulkader

Author(s):  
George J. Orme ◽  
Mauro Venturini

Abstract Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) liquefaction plants have become increasingly important as natural gas is exported from the United States of America to markets world-wide. Downtime of any part of the process train (gas turbine, compressors, controls, etc.) due to failure of one or more of its components can result in high costs. The total cost of loss is of great concern to the LNG industry as it moves towards increased LNG exports with required operational efficiency, and downtime reduced to a minimum. This paper reports the application of a methodology of property risk assessment, providing insight into the use of PML (Probable Maximum Loss) and MFL (Maximum Foreseeable Loss) risk measures. Major sources of risk are analyzed, drawing from both technical literature and operational information on typical large LNG liquefaction plants. The outcome of this paper is an estimation of the economic loss associated with property risk for two hypothetical LNG liquefaction plants, based upon sample plants located in North America and characterized by different capacity. These plants represent recently built and commissioned plants and are chosen to take advantage of current technology and plant capacities.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Black ◽  
Peter A. Bryan ◽  
Jeffrey D. Scobie

The business of liquefied natural gas (LNG) has very quickly become a topical and important energy concern. While the liquefication process has been developed and refined for a number of decades and importation of LNG is an accepted practice in the Middle East, Japan, Korea and parts of Europe, it is a relatively new source of supply in North America. However, increased North American demand for natural gas, coupled with diminishing production from accessible basins in Western Canada and the reduced costs and efficiencies of ships, liquefaction plants and storage terminals, have rendered LNG a viable and price competitive supply alternative. The LNG industry provides unique challenges to producers, regulators, consumers and stakeholders. Producers must not only negotiate development, joint venture and sale and purchase agreements, but also arrange for shipping and transportation and terminal services agreements. In North America, while regulators have divided jurisdiction over LNG terminal facilities on the basis of the location of the facility, the stage of production and the degree of integration with related infrastructure, they also appear to be encouraging further development by facilitating regulatory approval. As the Fairwinds and Qatar Petroleum projects demonstrate, the evolution of the LNG industry is dependent upon a delicate collaboration of governments, regulators, producers, financiers, consumers and stakeholders.


Energy Policy ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 3160-3168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia Ruester ◽  
Anne Neumann

2017 ◽  
pp. 130-134
Author(s):  
V. S. Shvets

The issue of an understudied phenomenon of rapid phase transition of liquefied natural gas in case of release underwater is described. Due to lack of physical and mathematical models of underwater rapid phase transition, it is impossible to get qualitative risk assessment of liquefied natural gas releases into water hazard. A model for calculation of underwater rapid phase transition is suggested.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document