Dostoevsky at 200: The State of the Field

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-121
Author(s):  
KATHERINE BOWERS ◽  
KATE HOLLAND
Keyword(s):  
1968 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleg Grabar

Like most other fields, the study of Islamic art is both the beneficiary and the victim of its own past. Like many fields, it is affected in various more or less successful ways by developments and needs in related areas of learning. Like all fields, it is tied to the quality and idiosyncrasies of the men who practice it. Inasmuch as bibliographical surveys according to traditional lines of techniques and periods are available (Pearson, Index Islamicus with supplements, London, 1958, 1962, 1968; especially K.A.C. Creswell, A Bibliography of the Architecture, Arts and Crafts of Islam, Cairo, 1961) and current works are listed with a fair degree of completeness in the yearly Abstracta Islamica published by the Revue des Etudes Islamiques, my concern in this paper will be to review the state of the field, the ways in which one can find out about it, and the work being done according to three major categories: traditional techniques and documentation; new problems and solutions; light and dark areas of research.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olaf Kolditz ◽  
Leslie A Jakobs ◽  
Ernst Huenges ◽  
Thomas Kohl

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 81-142
Author(s):  
Yousun Chung ◽  
Sun Wook Chung ◽  
Young Hee Chang
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Alice Staveley

‘Yet I’m the only woman in England free to write what I like. The others must be thinking of series’ & editors.’ Woolf’s 1925 homage to the impact of the Hogarth Press on her career is well known, signifying a new sense of herself as a woman writer in command of the means of creative production. Less well known is how pervasive were her private and public negotiations with the narratological implications of the feminist materialism she cultivated as a printer and publisher. This article reviews the state of the field, re-reads her early short fiction in the context of her typesetting experiments, which resonate with the conflicted history of women in the printing trades, and argues for a revisionist understanding of Woolf’s feminist modernism as isomorphic with the Hogarth Press.


Author(s):  
Esther J. Calzada ◽  
Lauren E. Gulbas ◽  
Carolina Hausmann-Stabile ◽  
Su Yeong Kim ◽  
Jodi Berger Cardoso

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-394
Author(s):  
Dafydd Fell ◽  
Gunter Schubert ◽  
Sung-sheng Yvonne Chang ◽  
Lev Nachman ◽  
Ming-yeh T. Rawnsley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document