Molecular phylogeny of moth flies (Diptera, Psychodidae, Psychodinae) revisited, with a revised tribal classification

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 596-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
GUNNAR MIKALSEN KVIFTE
2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 758-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREW R. CLINE ◽  
TREVOR R. SMITH ◽  
KELLY MILLER ◽  
MATTHEW MOULTON ◽  
MICHAEL WHITING ◽  
...  

Zootaxa ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4608 (1) ◽  
pp. 131 ◽  
Author(s):  
ADRIAN L.V. DAVIS ◽  
CHRISTIAN M. DESCHODT ◽  
CLARKE H. SCHOLTZ

The monophyletic, dung beetle subfamily, Scarabaeinae, has a long history of subdivision into tribes and subtribes represented by groups of genera unified by designated characters. Various tribal names have been proposed although only 11 or 12 were considered valid in recent reviews. Three of these 12 tribes have now been invalidated due to extensive polyphyly indicated by both morphological and molecular phylogenies. Although partial revision of tribal classification was proposed in the most recent global molecular phylogeny of the subfamily, this was primarily limited to redefinition of membership or provision of support for pre-existing tribes. Complete revision was not attempted as the phylogeny examined interrelationships between only ~52% of the valid described genera. It was also hampered by inconsistencies in topology using different analytical methods, weakened by limited bootstrap support for many basal nodes, as well predicting several phylogenetic relationships that seemed anomalous with regards to biogeographical hypotheses. Nevertheless, using this phylogeny, we propose further revision of tribal classification in a clade of primarily African genera included within a group defined as “basal Scarabaeinae”. Using three different methods, the sister lineages of this clade were consistently recovered, mostly with strong bootstrap support for their molecular relatedness. Therefore, we provide a number of defining morphological characters to support their proposed designation as three new tribes: Byrrhidiini, Endroedyolini and Odontolomini. We also discuss approaches to a full tribal revision as well as the implications for historical biogeography of the Scarabaeinae. 


2020 ◽  
pp. 207-214
Author(s):  
Akbar Fattahi

The Iranian species of the phyllodactylid geckos of the genus Asaccus are found only in the valleys of the Zagros Mountains, a region which represents an important area of endemism in western Iran. Recently, many relict species have been described from the central and southern parts of the Zagros Mountains, which were previously known as A. elisae. The recent descriptions of species within this complex suggest that diversity within the genus may be higher than expected and that its taxonomy and systematics should be revised. In the present study, phylogenetic relationships within the genus Asaccus were evaluated using two mitochondrial and one nuclear gene. Genetically, the genus shows high levels of variability. The molecular phylogeny of the genus suggests the presence of three main clades along the Zagros Mountains with the southern population (from the Hormozgan province) and one clade (A. sp8 and A. sp9) being sister taxon to A. montanus from UAE. The remaining samples are separated into two reciprocally monophyletic groups: the northern (Kurdistan, Kermanshah and Ilam provinces) and the central (Lorestan, Khuzestan, Kohgilouye-Bouyer Ahmad and Fars provinces) Zagros groups. The results of the present study suggest that populations attributed to A. elisae in Iran correspond to distinct lineages with high genetic distances. In brief, our results suggest that the genus needs a major taxonomical revision The Arabian origin of the genus has not been confirmed, because two populations from Zagros were located within the A. montanus, A. gallagheri and A. platyrhynchus clade. Further morphological analyses are needed to systematically define each genetic lineage as a new taxon.


Author(s):  
A. P. Sukhorukov ◽  
M. A. Kushunina

Kochia monticola was previously considered as a synonym for the widely distributed Irano-Turanian Panderia pilosa. After the merger of Kochia and Panderia with Bassia based on molecular phylogeny, K. monticola remained a synonym of Bassia pilosa. We claim that Bassia monticola, a name proposed by Kuntze (1891) for K. monticola, should be separated from B. pilosa based on morphological characters and localised distribution in mountainous regions of Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon at altitudes 1800–2600 m a. s. l.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document