A comparison of visual responses in the lateral geniculate nucleus of alert and anaesthetized macaque monkeys

Cells in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) were studied by presentation of visual stimuli and also by simultaneous recording of their ganglion cell inputs in the retina. This paper describes receptive-field properties and a new system of classification for LGN X-cells that appear to receive essentially only one excitatory retinal input. These X-cells were of two distinct classes. The visual responses of one class of cell (XS, single) replicated the basic form of the responses of a retinal X-cell. The other class of cell (XL, lagged) had responses with two remarkable features: their firing lagged 40-80 ms behind that of XS-cells or ganglion cells at response onset, and they fired anomalously at times when XS-cells or ganglion cells would not be firing. Thus, for a flashing spot, XL-cells were inhibited from firing after stimulus onset, during the time when XS-cells or retinal X-cells had an initial transient peak in firing; XL-cells generally had an anomalous peak in firing after stimulus offset, after XS-cells or retinal X-cells had stopped firing. For a moving bar, XS-cells or retinal X-cells responded primarily while the bar was in the receptive-field center, whereas most of a typical XL-cell's response occurred after the bar had left the receptive-field center. The latencies of various features in the visual responses were analyzed. For several visual response latencies, the distribution was clearly bimodal, thus objectively demonstrating the existence of two cell classes. Using only the latencies from spot and bar responses, over 90% of these single-input cells could be reliably identified as belonging to one of the two classes. The remaining cells (7 of 128) were intermediate between the two classes in some but not all respects; because they had some properties in common, these cells were kept in a separate group (XPL, partially lagged). The axons of both XS- and XL-cells could be antidromically activated from visual cortex. Cortical latencies were typically 0.7-2.0 ms for XS-cells but much longer, typically 2.4-5.0 ms, for XL-cells. It is possible that XL-cells have not previously been recognized as a separate class because cells with such long latencies have been recorded infrequently in the past. Responses to central flashing spots were more transient than those of retinal X-cells for most XS-cells and more sustained for most XL-cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Download Full-text

A functional role of cholinergic innervation to neurons in the cat visual cortex

Journal of Neurophysiology ◽

10.1152/jn.1987.58.4.765 ◽

1987 ◽

Vol 58 (4) ◽

pp. 765-780 ◽

Cited By ~ 169

Author(s):

H. Sato ◽

Y. Hata ◽

H. Masui ◽

T. Tsumoto

Keyword(s):

Electrical Stimulation ◽

Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽

Cortical Neurons ◽

Striate Cortex ◽

Cholinergic Innervation ◽

Neuron Activity ◽

Visual Responses ◽

Stimulus Movement ◽

Lateral Geniculate ◽

Stimulation Of

1. Effects of microionophoretic application of acetylcholine (ACh) and its antagonists on neuronal responses to visual stimuli and to electrical stimulation of the lateral geniculate nucleus were studied in the cat striate cortex. 2. Responses elicited visually and electrically were facilitated by ACh in 74% of the cells tested, whereas the responses were suppressed in 16%. These ACh effects were blocked by a muscarinic antagonist, atropine, but not by a nicotinic antagonist, hexamethonium, indicating that the ACh effects are mediated through muscarinic receptors. A single application of atropine suppressed visual responses of cells facilitated by ACh, whereas it enhanced those of cells inhibited by ACh, suggesting that endogenous ACh may tonically modulate visual responsivity of cortical neurons. 3. In most cells with the facilitatory ACh effect, responses with single spikes to the electrical stimulation became more consistent, often with double spikes, during the ACh application. The suppressive effects of ACh were noted most often in cells with a longer response latency to electrical stimulation of lateral geniculate nucleus. 4. In most of the facilitated cells the spontaneous activity remained null or very low during ACh application, in spite of marked enhancement of visual responses, suggesting that ACh may improve the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of cortical neuron activity. To confirm this suggestion, we calculated a S/S + N index by counting the total number of spikes in the responses (S) and that in peristimulus time histogram (S + N) and found that it was improved during the ACh application in about a half of the cells, whereas it became worse in about one-fifth. 5. In most of the facilitated cells, ACh enhanced visual responses not only to optimal but also to nonoptimal stimuli, resulting in no improvement or even worsening of the orientation selectivity. This was also the case in the selectivity of direction of stimulus movement. 6. The laminar location of the facilitated cells was biased toward layers V and VI of the cortex, although they also made up the majority in layers II + III and about half the tested cells in layers IVab and IVc. 7. In the light of recent understanding of cortical circuitry, these results suggest that the cholinergic innervation to cortical neurons may play a role in improvement of the S/N ratio of information processing in the striate cortex and in facilitation of sending processed informations to other visual centers.

Download Full-text