Improved Trust Region Model Management for Approximate Optimization

Author(s):  
Brett A. Wujek ◽  
John E. Renaud

Abstract Approximations play an important role in multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) by offering system behavior information at a relatively low cost. Most approximate optimization strategies are sequential in which an optimization of an approximate problem subject to design variable move limits is iteratively repeated until convergence. The move limits are imposed to restrict the optimization to regions of the design space in which the approximations provide meaningful information. In order to insure convergence of the sequence of approximate optimizations to a Karush Kuhn Tucker solution a move limit management strategy is required. In this paper, issues of move-limit management are reviewed and a new adaptive strategy for move limit management is developed. With its basis in the provably convergent trust region methodology, the TRAM (Trust region Ratio Approximation Method) strategy utilizes available gradient information and employs a backtracking process using various two-point approximation techniques to provide a flexible move-limit adjustment factor. The new strategy is successfully implemented in application to a suite of multidisciplinary design optimization test problems. These implementation studies highlight the ability of the TRAM strategy to control the amount of approximation error and efficiently manage the convergence to a Karush Kuhn Tucker solution.

2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 139-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
José F. Rodrı́guez ◽  
John E. Renaud ◽  
Brett A. Wujek ◽  
Ravindra V. Tappeta

2011 ◽  
Vol 110-116 ◽  
pp. 3031-3039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teng Long ◽  
Li Liu

—Metamodels have been widely applied in aircraft multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) to alleviate the computation burden and improve the optimization efficiency. At present, there are various metamodel methods available, such as response surface method, Kriging model, moving least squares method, radial basis function, neural networks and so on. However, it is difficult to confirm which metamodel method is more promising, which is also an interesting question puzzled most designers. In this article, by using a series of numerical test problems with different inherent features, a comprehensive study is employed to compare five typical metamodel methods commonly applied in aircraft MDO under multiple metrics. In term of the comparison results, the conclusions are drawn and recommendations for selecting suitable metamodels in aircraft MDO practice are also summarized.


Author(s):  
J. E. Renaud

Abstract This paper reviews the effectiveness of a recently developed second order based multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) algorithm in application to coupled engineering test problems. The second order based procedure significantly reduces the number of system analyses required for optimization as compared to first order based MDO procedures and single level optimization strategies. Based on these successes, this paper introduces a blueprint for an improved second order based MDO algorithm. The new algorithm is designed to provide additional design team compatibility and to exploit parallel computations during system optimization. The new algorithm introduces a modified non-hierarchic decomposition strategy (state space decomposition) that allows individual design teams to access the full design vector during concurrent subspace optimizations. Access to the the design vector in the new algorithm is now based on the local analyses capabilities of individual design teams. The coordination procedure of system approximation in the new algorithm will make use of second order global sensitivities. The new state space decomposition provides for the calculation of these sensitivities in parallel making use of local design data bases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document