Flexible Multibody Dynamics Formulation by Hamilton’s Equations

Author(s):  
Martin M. Tong

Numerical solution of the dynamics equations of a flexible multibody system as represented by Hamilton’s canonical equations requires that its generalized velocities q˙ be solved from the generalized momenta p. The relation between them is p = J(q)q˙, where J is the system mass matrix and q is the generalized coordinates. This paper presents the dynamics equations for a generic flexible multibody system as represented by p˙ and gives emphasis to a systematic way of constructing the matrix J for solving q˙. The mass matrix is shown to be separable into four submatrices Jrr, Jrf, Jfr and Jff relating the joint momenta and flexible body mementa to the joint coordinate rates and the flexible body deformation coordinate rates. Explicit formulas are given for these submatrices. The equations of motion presented here lend insight to the structure of the flexible multibody dynamics equations. They are also a versatile alternative to the acceleration-based dynamics equations for modeling mechanical systems.

1993 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 294-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Vukasovic ◽  
J. T. Celigu¨eta ◽  
J. Garci´a de Jalo´n ◽  
E. Bayo

In this paper we present an extension to flexible multibody systems of a system of fully cartesian coordinates previously used in rigid multibody dynamics. This method is fully compatible with the previous one, keeping most of its advantages in kinematics and dynamics. The deformation in each deformable body is expressed as a linear combination of Ritz vectors with respect to a local frame whose motion is defined by a series of points and vectors that move according to the rigid body motion. Joint constraint equations are formulated through the points and vectors that define each link. These are chosen so that a minimum use of local reference frames is done. The resulting equations of motion are integrated using the trapezoidal rule combined with fixed point iteration. An illustrative example that corresponds to a satellite deployment is presented.


Author(s):  
You-Fang Lu ◽  
Zhao-Hui Qi ◽  
Bin Wang ◽  
Guan-Min Feng

Abstract A new kind of floating frame whose parameters do not appear in equations of motion as additional unknowns is defined. Numerical analysis of flexible multibody dynamics is much facilitated by using finite-element iteration of the corresponding equations based on this concept.


Author(s):  
D. S. Bae ◽  
J. M. Han ◽  
J. H. Choi

Abstract A convenient implementation method for constrained flexible multibody dynamics is presented by introducing virtual rigid body and joint. The general purpose program for rigid and flexible multibody dynamics consists of three major parts of a set of inertia modules, a set of force modules, and a set of joint modules. Whenever a new force or joint module is added to the general purpose program, the modules for the rigid body dynamics are not reusable for the flexible body dynamics. Consequently, the corresponding modules for the flexible body dynamics must be formulated and programmed again. Since the flexible body dynamics handles more degrees of freedom than the rigid body dynamics does, implementation of the module is generally complicated and prone to coding mistakes. In order to overcome these difficulties, a virtual rigid body is introduced at every joint and force reference frames. New kinematic admissibility conditions are imposed on two body reference frames of the virtual and original bodies by introducing a virtual flexible body joint. There are some computational overheads due to the additional bodies and joints. However, since computation time is mainly depended on the frequency of flexible body dynamics, the computational overhead of the presented method could not be a critical problem, while implementation convenience is dramatically improved.


Author(s):  
Martin M. Tong

The computation of the generalized velocities from the generalized momenta of a multibody system is a part of the numerical solution of the dynamics equations when they are given in the Hamiltonian form. The states of these equations are the generalized coordinates and momenta, (q, p). The generalized velocity, q˙, is defined by q˙ = J−1p, where J is the system mass matrix. The effort in solving q˙ by direct methods is order(N3) where N is the number of bodies in the system. This paper presents an order(N) recursive algorithm to compute q˙ for flexible multibody systems.


Author(s):  
Daniel Garci´a-Vallejo ◽  
Jose´ L. Escalona ◽  
Juana M. Mayo ◽  
Jaime Domi´nguez

Multibody systems generally contain solids the deformations of which are appreciable and which decisively influence the dynamics of the system. These solids have to be modeled by means of special formulations for flexible solids. At the same time, other solids are of such a high stiffness that they may be considered rigid, which simplifies their modeling. For these reasons, for a rigid-flexible multibody system, two types of formulations co-exist in the equations of the system. Among the different possibilities provided in bibliography on the material, the formulation in natural coordinates and the formulation in absolute nodal coordinates are utilized in this article to model the rigid and flexible solids, respectively. This article contains a mixed formulation based on the possibility of sharing coordinates between a rigid solid and a flexible solid. In addition, the fact that the matrix of the global mass of the system is shown to be constant and that many of the constraint equations obtained upon utilizing these formulations are linear and can be eliminated. In this work, the formulation presented is utilized to simulate a mechanism with both rigid and flexible components.


2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-Suk Yoo ◽  
Su-Jin Park ◽  
Oleg N. Dmitrochenko ◽  
Dmitry Yu. Pogorelov

A review of the current state of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF) is proposed for large-displacement and large-deformation problems in flexible multibody dynamics. The review covers most of the known implementations of different kinds of finite elements including thin and thick planar and spatial beams and plates, their geometrical description inherited from FEM, and formulations of the most important elements of equations of motion. Much attention is also paid to simulation examples that show reasonableness and accuracy of the formulations applied to real physical problems and that are compared with experiments having significant geometrical nonlinearity. Current and further development directions of the ANCF are also briefly outlined.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document