CTOD Fracture Toughness Assessment Under Different Notch Type (Fatigue Pre-Cracking and EDM)

Author(s):  
Israel Marines-Garcia ◽  
Aaron Aguilar ◽  
Kristian Carreon ◽  
Philippe Darcis

Abstract The standardization of any mechanical material characterization is aiming to get homogenization on the testing physical execution by independent laboratories and to drive for accurate material evaluation between different entities. However, from time to time, standard tests may be reconsidered in order to improve their efficacy, execution time and incorporate new testing techniques or technologies without compromising the testing results and consistency. In the present work, fracture toughness crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) testing is addressed and particularly the need to perform fatigue pre-cracking prior monotonic testing. Without the fatigue pre-cracking, CTOD testing time can be significantly reduced during the preparation of specimens, meaning that specimens can be tested as soon as they are machined. Wire electro-discharge machining (EDM) technique allows generating sharp tip notches, and presents a good alternative to the standards specified fatigue pre-cracking [1–2]. In addition, this machining technology reduces the risk of rejecting the specimen testing, particularly when targeting weld heat affected zone/fusion line (HAZ/FL) microstructure on specimens with surface notch DNV-ST-F101 Figure B-9 [3], where it is specified that the crack tip shall be within a narrow distance (0.5 mm) from the fusion line (FL) or assess grain coarsened heat affected zone (GCHAZ) microstructure as indicated in DNV-ST-F101 section B.2.8.7 [3]. Herein, it is presented an assessment carried out in order to identify the notch type effect over the fracture toughness (CTOD) considering notches conditions as standard fatigue pre-crack and wire electro-discharge machining (EDM). Fifteen (15) CTOD specimens were manufactured from plain pipe material (same pipe), 251.3 mm OD × 20.9 mm WT, SMLS 450PD and tested according to ISO 12135 recommendations [1], they were distributed as follow; five (5) specimens according to standard recommendations with fatigue pre-cracking length ≥ 1.3 mm or 2.5%W (whichever is bigger), five (5) specimens with a fatigue pre-cracking length < 1.3 mm (between 0.5 mm to 1 mm), and five (5) specimens without fatigue pre-cracking (EDM notch), additionally, results from five (5) specimens previously tested in a round robin (RR) testing performed internally by Tenaris using the same LP material and standard fatigue pre-crack length. The crack length target (a/W) was kept 0.5 for all cases. Even if the sampling population is relatively small considering the three notch conditions, it seems that EDM might be an alternative to the standard specified fatigue pre-cracking. Thus, this experimental assessment aims to open the discussion on the use of EDM notch as alternative.

2013 ◽  
Vol 634-638 ◽  
pp. 2808-2812
Author(s):  
Zhu Feng Sun ◽  
Ling Yun Xie

Explored the influence of pore structure of foam metal material on mechanical behavior of fracture. Discuss fracture toughness of several different micro geometric structure of foam metal material with finite element method. The author's calculations showed, microstructure and loading mode has an important effect on the fracture toughness of the foam metal material. due to ignoring the effects of cell structure on the mechanical properties of materials, the classic fracture toughness criterion -crack tip opening displacement (COD) is incomplete, it would be more efficient to take opening displacement change rate of the crack-tip as the parameter to characteristic the metallic foam material fracture toughness.


Author(s):  
Dong-Yeob Park ◽  
Jean-Philippe Gravel ◽  
C. Hari Manoj Simha ◽  
Jie Liang ◽  
Da-Ming Duan

Shallow-notched single edge-notched tension (SE(T) or SENT) and deep- and shallow-notched single edge-notched bend (SE(B) or SENB) specimens with notches positioned in the weld and the heat-affected zone were tested. Crack-tip opening displacement (CTOD) versus resistance curves were obtained using both a single and double clip gauge consolidated in a SE(T) single-specimen. Up until the peak load the resistance curves from both gauging methods yield approximately the same results; thereafter the curves deviate. Interrupted testing showed that the crack had initiated below 50% of the peak load, and in some cases had propagated significantly prior to reaching the peak load.


Author(s):  
Sureshkumar Kalyanam ◽  
Yunior Hioe ◽  
Gery Wilkowski

Abstract SEN(T) specimens provide good similitude for surface cracks (SC) in pipes, where a SC structure has lower constraint condition than typically used fracture toughness specimens such as SEN(B) , and C(T). Additionally, the SENT specimen eliminates concern of material anisotropy since the crack growth direction in the SENT is the same as in a surface-cracked pipe. While the existing recommended and industrial practices for SEN(T) have been developed based on assumption of homogenous or mono-material across the crack, their applicability for the evaluation of fracture toughness of heat-affected-zone (HAZ) were evaluated in this investigation. When conducting tests on SEN(T) specimens with prescribed notch/crack in the HAZ, the asymmetric deformation around the crack causes the occurrence of a combination of Mode-I (crack opening) and Mode-II (crack in-plane shearing) behavior. This mode mixity affects the measurement of the crack-tip-opening-displacement (CTOD) and evaluation of elastic-plastic fracture mechanics parameter, J. The CTOD-R curve depicts the change in toughness with crack growth, in a manner similar to the J-R curve methodology. The experimental observations of Mode-I and Mode-II behavior seen in tests of SEN(T) specimens with notch/crack in the HAZ and as the crack propagates through the weld/HAZ thickness were investigated. The issues related to and the changes needed to account for such behavior for the development of recommended practices or standards for SEN(T) testing of weld/HAZ are addressed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document