Risk Assessment for Damaged Pressure Tank Cars

Author(s):  
Steven W. Kirkpatrick ◽  
Richard W. Klopp

Following an accident or derailment involving a freight train, emergency response, salvage, and repair personnel need to clear the right-of-way, repair the tracks, and remove the damaged rail cars. If the train contains pressure tank cars the potential hazard and safe handling procedures need to be determined prior to salvage and repair activities. The severity of the damage determines the appropriate course of action such as rerailing or unloading the damaged cars. The operations must avoid the risk to response personnel of a delayed rupture. A research program was performed to establish the validity of the existing industry guidelines for assessment of damaged pressure tank cars. The research program first focused on evaluating the technical foundation for the existing guidelines and the degree to which they have been validated. We then designed a program of experiments and analyses to validate the guidelines and estimate their margins of safety. The experimental effort used laboratory specimens to provide material property data as well as validation data for the analyses. The analyses used three different approaches: nonlinear elasto-plastic finite element simulations for modeling denting behavior, elasto-plastic fracture mechanics for analysis of cracks, and nonlinear finite element simulations combined with local fracture theories to quantify the severity of scores, gouges, and rail bums (longitudinal damage features caused by sliding a tank along a rail). This paper emphasizes the latter aspect of the work.

2013 ◽  
Vol 303-306 ◽  
pp. 1714-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Ling Liu

A novel flexure hinge named right circular corner filleted half hybrid flexure hinge was advanced. Based on the Castigliano second theorem, the compliance formulas of the novel flexure hinge were formulated. The theoretical calculations and the finite element simulations were performed simultaneously, the similar results were obtained which indicated the correctness of the compliance formulas. The influence of the geometric parameters of the novel flexure hinge on its performance was analysed. Compared with right circular corner filleted double hybrid flexure hinge, the compliance and sensitivity to the load of the novel half hybrid flexure hinge were better than that of the right circular corner filleted double hybrid flexure hinge. All of the above analysis results indicated the novel flexure hinge are more suitable for application in the compact structure and large displacement.


2020 ◽  
pp. 003329411989606
Author(s):  
Štěpán Bahník ◽  
Emir Efendic ◽  
Marek A. Vranka

When asked whether to sacrifice oneself or another person to save others, one might think that people would consider sacrificing themselves rather than someone else as the right and appropriate course of action—thus showing an other-serving bias. So far however, most studies found instances of a self-serving bias—people say they would rather sacrifice others. In three experiments using trolley-like dilemmas, we tested whether an other-serving bias might appear as a function of judgment type. That is, participants were asked to make a prescriptive judgment (whether the described action should or should not be done) or a normative judgment (whether the action is right or wrong). We found that participants exhibited an other-serving bias only when asked whether self- or other-sacrifice is wrong. That is, when the judgment was normative and in a negative frame (in contrast to the positive frame asking whether the sacrifice is right). Otherwise, participants tended to exhibit a self-serving bias; that is, they approved sacrificing others more. The results underscore the importance of question wording and suggest that some effects on moral judgment might depend on the type of judgment.


2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 463-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.V. Mitrofanov ◽  
V.I. Babitsky ◽  
V.V. Silberschmidt

2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (10) ◽  
pp. 972-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srecko Nesic ◽  
Klaus Unruh ◽  
Wilhelm Michels ◽  
Ulrich Krupp

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 67-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.E. Taylor ◽  
Jian Chen ◽  
Milana Huang ◽  
T. Canfield ◽  
R. Stevens

2021 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 107142
Author(s):  
Magdalena Heibeck ◽  
Martin Rudolph ◽  
Niels Modler ◽  
Markus Reuter ◽  
Angelos Filippatos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document