Calculating lightnesses in a single depth plane

2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 110 ◽  
Author(s):  
John McCann
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. C. Chai ◽  
B. Farell
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
H.C. Dijkerman ◽  
A.D. Milner ◽  
D.P. Carey
Keyword(s):  

Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 178-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Weiss ◽  
E H Adelson

A rotating ellipse and a translating ogive may appear rigid or nonrigid depending on their shapes. By placing moving dots (‘satellites’) in the space surrounding the contour one can cause the percept to switch between rigid and nonrigid, depending on how the dots move. We have studied how multiple surface cues can influence this grouping effect. One set of displays consisted of the ambiguous contour and a group of consistently moving satellites. We found that under this condition the grouping was extremely robust. The influence of the satellites on the perceived rigidity of the contour remained powerful when they were moved far away from the contour and even when they were placed at a different stereoscopic depth plane. A second set of displays consisted of the ambiguous contour and two groups of satellites: one group moving rigidly and the other nonrigidly. In these displays we found a strong effect of stereo and distance. One could cause the percept to switch from rigid to nonrigid by manipulating the relative distances of the display elements or the relative disparities. We discuss how these results can be accounted for in a computational model that combines form and motion information in a robust estimation framework.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir V. Petrov ◽  
Konstantin A. Grebenyuk

2001 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 867-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred H. Previc ◽  
Kennith W. Stevens ◽  
Nadeem Ghani ◽  
David A. Ludwig

Perception ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Saye ◽  
John P Frisby

Two experiments are reported which investigated the effects on stereopsis perception times of including monocularly conspicuous features in random-dot stereograms. It was found that such features facilitated stereopsis in large-disparity but not in small-disparity stereograms, perception times for the latter being relatively short with or without monocular features. Facilitation in the large-disparity stimuli came about both from features which delineated the shape of the whole disparate area and from features which merely happened to lie in the same depth plane as the disparate area, but which did not give any shape cues. It is argued that these various results can be well accounted for by a ‘vergence hypothesis’, which supposes that the long perception times often found with random-dot stereograms are due in part to the absence of stimulus features which can guide the vergence movements necessary for fusing the display.


2015 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 335-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Van der Stoep ◽  
T.C.W. Nijboer ◽  
S. Van der Stigchel ◽  
C. Spence

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document