oculogyral illusion
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

23
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2011 ◽  
Vol 209 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome Carriot ◽  
A. Bryan ◽  
P. DiZio ◽  
J. R. Lackner
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 867-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred H. Previc ◽  
Kennith W. Stevens ◽  
Nadeem Ghani ◽  
David A. Ludwig

2000 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 462-468
Author(s):  
Akira Suetsugu ◽  
Makito Kobiki ◽  
Takaji Matsushima

Perception ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert B Post

The possibility that nystagmus suppression contributes to illusory motion was investigated by measuring perceived motion of a stationary stimulus following the removal of an optokinetic stimulus. This was done because optokinetic nystagmus typically outlasts cessation of an optokinetic stimulus. Therefore, it would be expected that a stationary fixated stimulus should appear to move after removal of an optokinetic stimulus if illusory motion results from nystagmus suppression. Illusory motion was reported for a stationary fixation target following optokinetic stimulation. This motion was reported first in the same direction as the preceding induced motion, then in the opposite direction. The two directions of illusory motion following optokinetic stimulation are interpreted as resulting from the use of smooth ocular pursuit to suppress first one phase of optokinetic afternystagmus and then the reverse phase. Implications for the origins of induced motion are discussed.


1977 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert B. Welch ◽  
David J. Schroeder ◽  
Janet K. Thurgate ◽  
Carlton K. Erickson ◽  
Raymond L. Higgins ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Arroyo ◽  
R. Hinchcliffe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document