scholarly journals Evaluation of a commercial flatbed document scanner and radiographic film scanner for radiochromic EBT film dosimetry

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason E. Matney ◽  
Brent C. Parker ◽  
Daniel W. Neck ◽  
Greg Henkelmann ◽  
Isaac I. Rosen
2009 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. S218
Author(s):  
R. Srivastava ◽  
L. Olteanu ◽  
W. De Neve ◽  
C. De Wagter

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 473-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manisha K. Ranade ◽  
Jonathan G. Li ◽  
Ryan S. Dubose ◽  
Jakub Kozelka ◽  
William E. Simon ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 48 (23) ◽  
pp. N329-N334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsang Cheung ◽  
Peter K N Yu ◽  
Martin J Butson

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inhwan J. Yeo ◽  
Anthony Teran ◽  
Abiel Ghebremedhin ◽  
Matt Johnson ◽  
Baldev Patyal

2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
A De Puysseleyr ◽  
R P Srivastava ◽  
L Paelinck ◽  
W De Neve ◽  
C De Wagter

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 41-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Whitehouse ◽  
Fenella Moulding

The test image generated by a radiographic laser printer was used as a test object to measure the latitude and image noise of two digital cameras and a dedicated radiographic film scanner. The film scanner had the widest latitude and least image noise. A Kodak digital camera had a wider latitude but more image noise than an Olympus camera. A blue filter on the Olympus camera increased the latitude without significant increase in image noise.


1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce R. Whiting ◽  
Edward Muka ◽  
Thomas E. Kocher ◽  
Michael J. Flynn

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 87-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter L. Roberson ◽  
Jean M. Moran ◽  
Ravi Kulasekere

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document