Validation of the Single‐Impulse Correction Factor of the CHABA Impulse‐Noise Damage‐Risk Criterion

1970 ◽  
Vol 48 (6B) ◽  
pp. 1429-1430 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Hodge ◽  
Georges R. Garinther
Keyword(s):  
Correction Factor ◽  
Impulse Noise ◽  
Risk Criterion ◽  
Noise Damage ◽  
Damage Risk

Comparison of impulse noise damage risk criteria using the chinchilla impulse noise exposures.

2010 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 1839-1839
Author(s):  
William J. Murphy ◽  
Amir Khan ◽  
Peter B. Shaw
Keyword(s):  
Impulse Noise ◽  
Risk Criteria ◽  
Noise Damage ◽  
Damage Risk

scholarly journals Importance of the waveform of the impulse in formulating an Impulse Noise Damage Risk Criteria

1977 ◽  
Vol 62 (S1) ◽  
pp. S34-S34
Author(s):  
D. Henderson ◽  
K. Hynson ◽  
R. P. Hamernik
Keyword(s):  
Impulse Noise ◽  
Risk Criteria ◽  
Noise Damage ◽  
Damage Risk

Impulse noise damage risk criteria

1973 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.G. Rice ◽  
A.M. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Impulse Noise ◽  
Risk Criteria ◽  
Noise Damage ◽  
Damage Risk

Applicability of the Leq as a damage‐risk criterion: An animal experiment

1996 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 1621-1632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Lataye ◽  
Pierre Campo
Keyword(s):  
Animal Experiment ◽  
Risk Criterion ◽  
Damage Risk

scholarly journals Comparison of Vocal Vibration-Dose Measures for Potential-Damage Risk Criteria

2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 1425-1439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo R. Titze ◽  
Eric J. Hunter
Keyword(s):  
Energy Dissipation ◽  
Dose Calculations ◽  
Equal Energy ◽  
Vocal Fold Vibration ◽  
Risk Criterion ◽  
Time Cycle ◽  
Vocal Intensity ◽  
Potential Damage ◽  
Voice Use ◽  
Damage Risk

Purpose Schoolteachers have become a benchmark population for the study of occupational voice use. A decade of vibration-dose studies on the teacher population allows a comparison to be made between specific dose measures for eventual assessment of damage risk. Method Vibration dosimetry is reformulated with the inclusion of collision stress. Two methods of estimating amplitude of vocal-fold vibration are compared to capture variations in vocal intensity. Energy loss from collision is added to the energy-dissipation dose. An equal-energy-dissipation criterion is defined and used on the teacher corpus as a potential-damage risk criterion. Results Comparison of time-, cycle-, distance-, and energy-dose calculations for 57 teachers reveals a progression in information content in the ability to capture variations in duration, speaking pitch, and vocal intensity. The energy-dissipation dose carries the greatest promise in capturing excessive tissue stress and collision but also the greatest liability, due to uncertainty in parameters. Cycle dose is least correlated with the other doses. Conclusion As a first guide to damage risk in excessive voice use, the equal-energy-dissipation dose criterion can be used to structure trade-off relations between loudness, adduction, and duration of speech.

scholarly journals Damage‐Risk Criterion for Steady‐State Noise

1963 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 777-777
Author(s):  
Kalr D. Kryter
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Risk Criterion ◽  
Damage Risk
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document