A study of signal‐to‐noise ratio conditions for measuring the intelligibility of hearing aids in noisy live environments

2006 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 3158-3158
Author(s):  
Yasuhiko Arai ◽  
Yoshiyuki Yoshizumi
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Noise Ratio

scholarly journals Consistency of Hearing Aid Setting Preference in Simulated Real-World Environments: Implications for Trainable Hearing Aids

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 233121652093339
Author(s):  
Els Walravens ◽  
Gitte Keidser ◽  
Louise Hickson
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Real World ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Traffic Noise ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Acoustic Environment ◽  
Change Environment ◽  
Noise Ratio

Trainable hearing aids let users fine-tune their hearing aid settings in their own listening environment: Based on consistent user-adjustments and information about the acoustic environment, the trainable aids will change environment-specific settings to the user’s preference. A requirement for effective fine-tuning is consistency of preference for similar settings in similar environments. The aim of this study was to evaluate consistency of preference for settings differing in intensity, gain-frequency slope, and directionality when listening in simulated real-world environments and to determine if participants with more consistent preferences could be identified based on profile measures. A total of 52 adults (63–88 years) with hearing varying from normal to a moderate sensorineural hearing loss selected their preferred setting from pairs differing in intensity (3 or 6 dB), gain-frequency slope (±1.3 or ± 2.7 dB/octave), or directionality (omnidirectional vs. cardioid) in four simulated real-world environments: traffic noise, a monologue in traffic noise at 5 dB signal-to-noise ratio, and a dialogue in café noise at 5 and at 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Forced-choice comparisons were made 10 times for each combination of pairs of settings and environment. Participants also completed nine psychoacoustic, cognitive, and personality measures. Consistency of preference, defined by a setting preferred at least 9 out of 10 times, varied across participants. More participants obtained consistent preferences for larger differences between settings and less difficult environments. The profile measures did not predict consistency of preference. Trainable aid users could benefit from counselling to ensure realistic expectations for particular adjustments and listening situations.

Effects of Adaptive Hearing Aid Directionality and Noise Reduction on Masked Speech Recognition for Children Who Are Hard of Hearing

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna M. Browning ◽  
Emily Buss ◽  
Mary Flaherty ◽  
Tim Vallier ◽  
Lori J. Leibold
Keyword(s):  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Hard Of Hearing ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Open Set ◽  
Fully Adaptive ◽  
Noise Ratio

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate speech-in-noise and speech-in-speech recognition associated with activation of a fully adaptive directional hearing aid algorithm in children with mild to severe bilateral sensory/neural hearing loss. Method Fourteen children (5–14 years old) who are hard of hearing participated in this study. Participants wore laboratory hearing aids. Open-set word recognition thresholds were measured adaptively for 2 hearing aid settings: (a) omnidirectional (OMNI) and (b) fully adaptive directionality. Each hearing aid setting was evaluated in 3 listening conditions. Fourteen children with normal hearing served as age-matched controls. Results Children who are hard of hearing required a more advantageous signal-to-noise ratio than children with normal hearing to achieve comparable performance in all 3 conditions. For children who are hard of hearing, the average improvement in signal-to-noise ratio when comparing fully adaptive directionality to OMNI was 4.0 dB in noise, regardless of target location. Children performed similarly with fully adaptive directionality and OMNI settings in the presence of the speech maskers. Conclusions Compared to OMNI, fully adaptive directionality improved speech recognition in steady noise for children who are hard of hearing, even when they were not facing the target source. This algorithm did not affect speech recognition when the background noise was speech. Although the use of hearing aids with fully adaptive directionality is not proposed as a substitute for remote microphone systems, it appears to offer several advantages over fixed directionality, because it does not depend on children facing the target talker and provides access to multiple talkers within the environment. Additional experiments are required to further evaluate children's performance under a variety of spatial configurations in the presence of both noise and speech maskers.

A Signal-to-Noise Ratio Model for the Speech-Reception Threshold of the Hearing Impaired

1986 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinier Plomp
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Noise Level ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Noise Levels ◽  
Threshold Elevation ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Speech Reception ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Two Parameters

This paper reviews the results of a series of investigations inspired by a model of the speech-reception threshold (SRT) of hearing-impaired listeners. The model contains two parameters accounting for the SRT of normal-hearing listeners (SRT in quiet and signal-to-noise ratio corresponding to the threshold at high noise levels), two parameters describing the hearing loss (attenuation and threshold elevation in terms of signal-to-noise ratio), and three parameters describing the hearing aid (acoustic gain, threshold elevation expressed in signal-to-noise ratio, and equivalent internal noise level). Experimental data are reported for three different types of hearing impairment: presbycusis, hearing losses with a pathological origin, and noise-induced losses. The model gives an excellent description of the data. It demonstrates that for many hearing-impaired persons speech intelligibility at noise levels beyond 50 to 60 dB(A) is their main problem, whereas hearing aids are most effective below that noise level.

Adaptation of the BKB-SIN Test for Use as a Pediatric Aided Outcome Measure

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (06) ◽  
pp. 375-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stella L. Ng ◽  
Christine N. Meston ◽  
Susan D. Scollie ◽  
Richard C. Seewald
Keyword(s):  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Directional Microphone ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
Noise Ratio

Background: There is a need for objective pediatric hearing aid outcome measurement and thus a need for the evaluation of outcome measures. We explored a commercially available pediatric sentence-in-noise measure adapted for use as an aided outcome measure. Purpose: The purposes of the current study were (1) to administer an adapted BKB-SIN (Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise test) to adults and children who have normal hearing and children who use hearing aids and (2) to evaluate the utility of this adapted BKB-SIN as an aided, within-subjects outcome measure for amplification strategies. Research Design: We used a mixed within and between groups design to evaluate speech recognition in noise for the three groups of participants. The children who use hearing aids were tested under the omnidirectional, directional, and digital noise reduction (DNR) conditions. Results from each group were compared to each other, and we compared results of each aided condition for the children who use hearing aids to evaluate the test utility as an aided outcome measure. Study Sample: The study sample consisted of 14 adults with normal hearing (aged 22–28 yr) and 15 children with normal hearing (aged 6–18 yr), recruited through word of mouth, and 14 children who use hearing aids (aged 9–16 yr) recruited from local audiology clinics. Data Collection and Analysis: List pairs of the BKB-SIN test were presented at 50 dB HL as follows: four list pairs to each participant with normal hearing, four list pairs in the omnidirectional condition, and two list pairs in the directional and DNR conditions. Children who use hearing aids were fitted bilaterally with laboratory devices and completed the BKB-SIN test aided. Data were plotted as mean percent of key words correct at each signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Further, we conducted an analysis of variance for group differences and within-groups for the three aided conditions. Results: Adult participants outperformed children with normal hearing, who outperformed the children who use hearing aids. SNR-50 (signal-to-noise ratio at which listener can obtain a speech recognition score of 50% correct) scores demonstrated reliability of the adapted test implementation. The BKB-SIN test measured significant differences in performance for omnidirectional versus directional microphone conditions but not between omnidirectional and DNR conditions. Conclusions: We conclude that the adapted implementation of the BKB-SIN test can be administered reliably and feasibly. Further study is warranted to develop norms for the adapted implementation as well as to determine if an adapted implementation can be sensitive to age effects. Until such norms are developed, clinicians should refrain from comparing results from the adapted test to the test manual norms and should instead use the adapted implementation as a within-subject measure.

Measuring real-ear signal-to-noise ratio: Application to directional hearing aids

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven L. Bell ◽  
Sarah A. Creeke ◽  
Mark E. Lutman
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Directional Hearing ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Directional Hearing Aids

scholarly journals Signal-to-Noise-Ratio-Aware Dynamic Range Compression in Hearing Aids

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 233121651879090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias May ◽  
Borys Kowalewski ◽  
Torsten Dau
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Dynamic Range Compression ◽  
Noise Ratio

Modeling the Influence of Acoustic Coupling of Hearing Aids on FM Signal-to-Noise Ratio

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-187
Author(s):  
Linda W. Norrix ◽  
Dianne Van Tasell ◽  
Jessie Ross ◽  
Frances P. Harris ◽  
James Dean
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
Acoustic Coupling ◽  
Primary Difference ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Gain Loss ◽  
Open Versus

Purpose A model was developed to examine variables that influence signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the tympanic membrane (TM) when using a hearing aid (HA) and frequency modulated (FM) system. The model was used to explore how HA coupling influences SNR. Method To generate the model, HA output was measured in a coupler. Known coupler to real-ear transformations and known values for vent (gain) loss as a function of coupling were also used. The model was verified by measuring sound pressure level (SPL) at the TM in 6 ears. Results The model predicts similar overall SNRs at the TM regardless of coupling method when HA and FM microphones are active. The primary difference in SNR is in the low frequencies and depends on the amount of low frequency insertion gain and the noise levels at the HA and FM microphones. Conclusions A model was developed to explore how complex variables contribute to SNR at the TM. One variable, HA coupling, is predicted to have only a minimal effect on SNR at the TM when there is HA gain. Further studies will be needed to assess the real-world effectiveness of an FM system coupled to an open- versus closed-fit HA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document