Masking escape in killer whales, stereotypical call design as a noise impact reduction strategy

2021 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. A251-A251
Author(s):  
Harald Yurk ◽  
Caitlin O'Neill ◽  
Rianna Burnham ◽  
Christie Morrison ◽  
Svein Vagle
1977 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 585-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
S M Taylor ◽  
F L Hall

Investigation of the factors affecting individual response to noise provides an improved basis for the selection and implementation of noise impact reduction policies. This investigation is necessary because the cause and effect relationship between the level of noise exposure and noise response is confounded by personal and situational variables. Examination of the effects of these variables on response to road traffic noise with the use of data collected at residential sites in Southern Ontario suggests the following points for residential planning decisions. Arguments for taking no action to reduce noise impact are not supported. The sex, age, and socioeconomic compositions of residential areas are not important considerations for implementing measures to reduce noise impact. Life-style characteristics of residents on the other hand do affect response to noise. Methods to reduce noise must be effective indoors and outdoors to have a significant effect on attitudes: air conditioning alone is inadequate. Noise barriers appear to be more effective for improving attitudes than their noise reduction properties would suggest.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 804-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Lockrey ◽  
Karli Verghese ◽  
Enda Crossin ◽  
Gordon Young

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulán Úbeda ◽  
Sara Ortín ◽  
Judy St. Leger ◽  
Miquel Llorente ◽  
Javier Almunia

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjolijn L. Antheunis ◽  
Patti M. Valkenburg ◽  
Jochen Peter

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 478-482
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Mucientes ◽  
Adriana González-Pestana

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document