Geologic Time Scale: Isotopic age determinations on rocks of known stratigraphic age define an absolute time scale for earth history

Science ◽  
1961 ◽  
Vol 133 (3459) ◽  
pp. 1105-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Kulp
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
C. Soriano

In the coming years the Anthropocene will be likely submitted to formalization by the Anthropocene Working Group as a chronostratigraphic unit of the Geologic Time Scale. This has generated an increasing debate among detractors and defenders of its formalization in general, and of the proposal by the Anthropocene Working Group in particular. Here, the main issues regarding the Geologic Time Scale and the rules to formalize units, the empirical data supporting the Anthropocene formalization and the critiques to formalize it are critically reviewed. The procedure to formalize the Anthropocene is not dissimilar from those of the other units of the Geologic Time Scale and has been essentially based on stratigraphic and geologic criteria. Following the recommendation of the Anthropocene Working Group and based on the empirical evidence on the Anthropocene as it is expressed in strata and, more important, on the immanent and structural link between the Anthropocene and the reproduction of capital, it is proposed to define Capitalian as a Stage of the Anthropocene Epoch. In this way, a truly comprehensive understanding of the Earth history is obtained, which comprises the ultimate causes of the ongoing planetary transformation and its stratatigraphic expression.


Author(s):  
Erle C. Ellis

If we are to understand the case both for and against recognizing the Anthropocene as an interval of geologic time, a basic understanding of the science of stratigraphy and how the Geologic Time Scale is established is essential. ‘Geologic time’ outlines the origins of stratigraphy and the publication of the Geologic Time Scale (GTS) that brought together the work of generations of stratigraphers within a single standardized geochronology of Earth history. It explains how the GTS is divided into different time intervals and considers the work of the Anthropocene Working Group whose task is to examine the case for recognizing the Anthropocene as a new interval of geologic time.


1991 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 786-786
Author(s):  
John J. Flynn

2013 ◽  
pp. 476-476
Author(s):  
Frank D. Stacey ◽  
Paul M. Davis

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 473
Author(s):  
Tegan Smith ◽  
John Laurie ◽  
Lisa Hall ◽  
Robert Nicoll ◽  
Andrew Kelman ◽  
...  

The international Geologic Time Scale (GTS) continually evolves due to refinements in age dating and the addition of more defined stages. The GTS 2012 has replaced GTS 2004 as the global standard timescale, resulting in changes to the age and duration of most chronological stages. These revisions have implications for interpreted ages and durations of sedimentary rocks in Australian basins, with ramifications for petroleum systems modelling. Accurate stratigraphic ages are required to reliably model the burial history of a basin, hence kerogen maturation and hydrocarbon expulsion and migration. When the resolution of the time scale is increased, models that utilise updated ages will better reflect the true basin history. The international GTS is largely built around northern hemisphere datasets. At APPEA 2009, Laurie et al. announced a program to tie Australian biozones to GTS 2004. Now, with the implementation of GTS 2012, these ties are being updated and refined, requiring a comprehensive review of the correlations between Australian and International biozonation schemes. The use of Geoscience Australia’s Timescales Database and a customised ‘Australian Datapack’ for the visualisation software package TimeScale Creator has greatly facilitated the transition from GTS 2004 to GTS 2012, as anticipated in the design of the program in 2009. Geoscience Australia’s basin biozonation and stratigraphy charts (e.g. Northern Carnarvon and Browse basins) are being reproduced to reflect the GTS 2012 and modified stratigraphic ages. Additionally, new charts are being added to the series, including a set of onshore basin charts, such as the Georgina and Canning basins.


2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix M. Gradstein ◽  
James G. Ogg ◽  
Martin van Kranendonk

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document