scholarly journals Frequency Tuning of Basilar Membrane and Auditory Nerve Fibers in the Same Cochleae

1998 ◽  
Vol 282 (5395) ◽  
pp. 1882-1884 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. S. Narayan
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Basilar Membrane ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers

scholarly journals Threshold Tuning Curves of Chinchilla Auditory-Nerve Fibers. I. Dependence on Characteristic Frequency and Relation to the Magnitudes of Cochlear Vibrations

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 2889-2898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei N. Temchin ◽  
Nola C. Rich ◽  
Mario A. Ruggero
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Basilar Membrane ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Gradual Transition ◽  
Characteristic Frequencies ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers ◽  
Threshold Tuning

Frequency-threshold tuning curves were recorded in thousands of auditory-nerve fibers (ANFs) in chinchilla. Synthetic tuning curves with 21 characteristic frequencies (187 Hz to 19.04 kHz, spaced every 1/3 octave) were constructed by averaging individual tuning curves within 2/3-octave frequency bands. Tuning curves undergo a gradual transition in symmetry at characteristic frequencies (CFs) of 1 kHz and an abrupt change in shape at CFs of 3–4 kHz. For CFs ≤3 kHz, the lower limbs of tuning curves have similar slopes, about −18 dB/octave, but the upper limbs have slopes that become increasingly steep with increasing frequency and CF. For CFs >4 kHz, tuning curves normalized to the CF are nearly identical and consist of three segments. A tip segment, within 30–40 dB of CF threshold, has lower- and upper-limb slopes of −60 and +120 dB/octave, respectively, and is flanked by a low-frequency (“tail”) segment, with shallow slope, and a terminal high-frequency segment with very steep slope (several hundreds of dB/octave). The tuning curves of fibers innervating basal cochlear sites closely resemble basilar-membrane tuning curves computed with low isovelocity criteria. At the apex of the chinchilla cochlea, frequency tuning is substantially sharper for ANFs than for available recordings of organ of Corti vibrations.

scholarly journals Threshold Tuning Curves of Chinchilla Auditory Nerve Fibers. II. Dependence on Spontaneous Activity and Relation to Cochlear Nonlinearity

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 2899-2906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei N. Temchin ◽  
Nola C. Rich ◽  
Mario A. Ruggero
Keyword(s):  
Spontaneous Activity ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Characteristic Frequency ◽  
Basilar Membrane ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Nonmonotonic Dependence ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers ◽  
Threshold Tuning

Spontaneous activity and frequency threshold tuning curves were studied in thousands of auditory nerve fibers in chinchilla. The frequency distribution of spontaneous activity rates is strongly bimodal for auditory nerve fibers with characteristic frequency <3 kHz but only mildly bimodal for the entire sample. Spontaneous activity rates and thresholds at the characteristic frequency are inversely related. Auditory-nerve fibers with low spontaneous rate have tuning curves with lower tip-to-tail ratios and more sharply tuned tips than the tuning curves of fibers with high spontaneous rates. It is shown here that this dependence of tuning on spontaneous rates is consistent with a previously unnoticed nonmonotonic dependence on iso-velocity criterion of the frequency tuning of basilar membrane vibrations.

scholarly journals Wiener Kernels of Chinchilla Auditory-Nerve Fibers: Verification Using Responses to Tones, Clicks, and Noise and Comparison With Basilar-Membrane Vibrations

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 3635-3648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei N. Temchin ◽  
Alberto Recio-Spinoso ◽  
Pim van Dijk ◽  
Mario A. Ruggero
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Characteristic Frequency ◽  
Basilar Membrane ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Wiener Kernels ◽  
Neural Processes ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers ◽  
Group Delays ◽  
Membrane Vibrations

Responses to tones, clicks, and noise were recorded from chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers (ANFs). The responses to noise were analyzed by computing the zeroth-, first-, and second-order Wiener kernels (h0, h1, and h2). The h1s correctly predicted the frequency tuning and phases of responses to tones of ANFs with low characteristic frequency (CF). The h2s correctly predicted the frequency tuning and phases of responses to tones of all ANFs, regardless of CF. Also regardless of CF, the kernels jointly predicted about 77% of the features of ANF responses to “frozen” samples of noise. Near-CF group delays of kernels and signal-front delays of responses to intense rarefaction clicks exceeded by 1 ms the corresponding basilar-membrane delays at both apical and basal sites of the chinchilla cochlea. This result, confirming that synaptic and neural processes amount to 1 ms regardless of CF, permitted drawing a map of basilar-membrane delay as a function of position for the entire length of the chinchilla cochlea, a first for amniotic species.

scholarly journals Mechanics of the Mammalian Cochlea

2001 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 1305-1352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Robles ◽  
Mario A. Ruggero
Keyword(s):  
Hair Cell ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Basilar Membrane ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Stimulus Frequency ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Outer Hair Cells ◽  
Cochlear Amplifier ◽  
Ear Ossicles ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers

In mammals, environmental sounds stimulate the auditory receptor, the cochlea, via vibrations of the stapes, the innermost of the middle ear ossicles. These vibrations produce displacement waves that travel on the elongated and spirally wound basilar membrane (BM). As they travel, waves grow in amplitude, reaching a maximum and then dying out. The location of maximum BM motion is a function of stimulus frequency, with high-frequency waves being localized to the “base” of the cochlea (near the stapes) and low-frequency waves approaching the “apex” of the cochlea. Thus each cochlear site has a characteristic frequency (CF), to which it responds maximally. BM vibrations produce motion of hair cell stereocilia, which gates stereociliar transduction channels leading to the generation of hair cell receptor potentials and the excitation of afferent auditory nerve fibers. At the base of the cochlea, BM motion exhibits a CF-specific and level-dependent compressive nonlinearity such that responses to low-level, near-CF stimuli are sensitive and sharply frequency-tuned and responses to intense stimuli are insensitive and poorly tuned. The high sensitivity and sharp-frequency tuning, as well as compression and other nonlinearities (two-tone suppression and intermodulation distortion), are highly labile, indicating the presence in normal cochleae of a positive feedback from the organ of Corti, the “cochlear amplifier.” This mechanism involves forces generated by the outer hair cells and controlled, directly or indirectly, by their transduction currents. At the apex of the cochlea, nonlinearities appear to be less prominent than at the base, perhaps implying that the cochlear amplifier plays a lesser role in determining apical mechanical responses to sound. Whether at the base or the apex, the properties of BM vibration adequately account for most frequency-specific properties of the responses to sound of auditory nerve fibers.

Frequency Tuning and Spontaneous Activity in the Auditory Nerve and Cochlear Nucleus Magnocellularis of the Barn Owl Tyto alba

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 364-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Köppl
Keyword(s):  
Response Latency ◽  
Cochlear Nucleus ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Barn Owl ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Spontaneous Discharge ◽  
Tyto Alba ◽  
Nucleus Magnocellularis ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers

Köppl, Christine. Frequency tuning and spontaneous activity in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl Tyto alba. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 364–377, 1997. Single-unit recordings were obtained from the brain stem of the barn owl at the level of entrance of the auditory nerve. Auditory nerve and nucleus magnocellularis units were distinguished by physiological criteria, with the use of the response latency to clicks, the spontaneous discharge rate, and the pattern of characteristic frequencies encountered along an electrode track. The response latency to click stimulation decreased in a logarithmic fashion with increasing characteristic frequency for both auditory nerve and nucleus magnocellularis units. The average difference between these populations was 0.4–0.55 ms. The most sensitive thresholds were ∼0 dB SPL and varied little between 0.5 and 9 kHz. Frequency-threshold curves showed the simple V shape that is typical for birds, with no indication of a low-frequency tail. Frequency selectivity increased in a gradual, power-law fashion with increasing characteristic frequency. There was no reflection of the unusual and greatly expanded mapping of higher frequencies on the basilar papilla of the owl. This observation is contrary to the equal-distance hypothesis that relates frequency selectivity to the spatial respresentation in the cochlea. On the basis of spontaneous rates and/or sensitivity there was no evidence for distinct subpopulations of auditory nerve fibers, such as the well-known type I afferent response classes in mammals. On the whole, barn owl auditory nerve physiology conformed entirely to the typical patterns seen in other bird species. The only exception was a remarkably small spread of thresholds at any one frequency, this being only 10–15 dB in individual owls. Average spontaneous rate was 72.2 spikes/s in the auditory nerve and 219.4 spikes/s for nucleus magnocellularis. This large difference, together with the known properties of endbulb-of-Held synapses, suggests a convergence of ∼2–4 auditory nerve fibers onto one nucleus magnocellularis neuron. Some auditory nerve fibers as well as nucleus magnocellularis units showed a quasiperiodic spontaneous discharge with preferred intervals in the time-interval histogram. This phenomenon was observed at frequencies as high as 4.7 kHz.

Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression

1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 1087-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Ruggero ◽  
L. Robles ◽  
N. C. Rich
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Outer Hair Cell ◽  
Basilar Membrane ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Oval Window ◽  
Outer Hair Cells ◽  
Probe Intensity ◽  
Rate Suppression

1. The vibratory response to two-tone stimuli was measured in the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea by means of the Mossbauer technique or laser velocimetry. Measurements were made at sites with characteristic frequency (CF, the frequency at which an auditory structure is most sensitive) of 7-10 kHz, located approximately 3.5 mm from the oval window. 2. Two-tone suppression (reduction in the response to one tone due to the presence of another) was demonstrated for CF probe tones and suppressor tones with frequencies both higher and lower than CF, at moderately low stimulus levels, including probe-suppressor combinations for which responses to the suppressor were lower than responses to the probe tone alone. 3. For a fixed suppressor tone, suppression magnitude decreased as a function of increasing probe intensity. 4. The magnitude of suppression increased monotonically with suppressor intensity. 5. The rate of growth of suppression magnitude with suppressor intensity was higher for suppressors in the region below CF than for those in the region above CF. 6. For low-frequency suppressor tones, suppression magnitude varied periodically, attaining one or two maxima within each period of the suppressor tone. 7. Suppression was frequency tuned: for either above-CF or below-CF suppressor tones, suppression magnitude reached a maximum for probe frequencies near CF. 8. Cochlear damage or death diminished or abolished suppression. There was a clear positive correlation between magnitude of suppression and basilar-membrane sensitivity for responses to CF tones. 9. Suppression tended to be accompanied by small phase lags in responses to CF probe tones. 10. Because all of the features of two-tone suppression at the basilar membrane match qualitatively (and, generally, also quantitatively) the features of two-tone rate suppression in auditory-nerve fibers, it is concluded that neural two-tone rate suppression originates in mechanical phenomena at the basilar membrane. 11. Because the lability of mechanical suppression parallels the loss of sensitivity and frequency tuning due to outer hair cell dysfunction, the present findings suggest that mechanical two-tone suppression arises from an interaction between the outer hair cells and the basilar membrane.

scholarly journals Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates

2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 577-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Furman ◽  
Sharon G. Kujawa ◽  
M. Charles Liberman
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Sensory Cells ◽  
High Threshold ◽  
Distortion Product ◽  
Selective Loss ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers

Acoustic overexposure can cause a permanent loss of auditory nerve fibers without destroying cochlear sensory cells, despite complete recovery of cochlear thresholds ( Kujawa and Liberman 2009 ), as measured by gross neural potentials such as the auditory brainstem response (ABR). To address this nominal paradox, we recorded responses from single auditory nerve fibers in guinea pigs exposed to this type of neuropathic noise (4- to 8-kHz octave band at 106 dB SPL for 2 h). Two weeks postexposure, ABR thresholds had recovered to normal, while suprathreshold ABR amplitudes were reduced. Both thresholds and amplitudes of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions fully recovered, suggesting recovery of hair cell function. Loss of up to 30% of auditory-nerve synapses on inner hair cells was confirmed by confocal analysis of the cochlear sensory epithelium immunostained for pre- and postsynaptic markers. In single fiber recordings, at 2 wk postexposure, frequency tuning, dynamic range, postonset adaptation, first-spike latency and its variance, and other basic properties of auditory nerve response were all completely normal in the remaining fibers. The only physiological abnormality was a change in population statistics suggesting a selective loss of fibers with low- and medium-spontaneous rates. Selective loss of these high-threshold fibers would explain how ABR thresholds can recover despite such significant noise-induced neuropathy. A selective loss of high-threshold fibers may contribute to the problems of hearing in noisy environments that characterize the aging auditory system.

Biomechanics of Hearing Sensitivity

1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sir James Lighthill
Keyword(s):  
Hair Cells ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Basilar Membrane ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Outer Hair Cells ◽  
Hearing Sensitivity ◽  
Sound Levels ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Stiffness Distribution

This survey lecture on the biomechanics of hearing sensitivity is concerned, not with how the brain in man and other mammals analyzes the data coming to it along auditory nerve fibers, but with the initial capture of that data in the cochlea. The brain, needless to say, can produce all its miracles of interpretation only where it works on good initial data. For frequency selectivity these depend on some remarkable properties of the cochlea as a passive macromechanical system, comprising the basilar membrane with its steeply graded stiffness distribution vibrating within the cochlear fluids. But the biomechanics of hearing sensitivity to low levels of sound (at any particular frequency) calls also into play an active micromechanical system, which during the past few years has progressively been identified as located in the outer hair cells, and which, through a process of positive feedback, amplifies (in healthy ears) that basilar membrane vibration. This in turn offers the inner hair cells an enhanced signal at low sound levels, so that the threshold at which they can generate activity in auditory nerve fibers is, in consequence, very substantially lowered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document