scholarly journals Risk Factors for Selection of the L74I Reverse Transcriptase Mutation in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 2553-2556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Wirden ◽  
Bénédicte Roquebert ◽  
Anne Derache ◽  
Anne Simon ◽  
Claudine Duvivier ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT We analyzed 3,475 human immunodeficiency virus sequences and 241 therapeutic histories. The L74I mutation was carried by 7% of viruses. L74I was strongly associated with T215F, K70R, and V75M/S/T/A mutations and increased with the number of thymidine analog mutations. It seemed to be linked to the use of abacavir or efavirenz.

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 4971-4977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Urvi M. Parikh ◽  
Lee Bacheler ◽  
Dianna Koontz ◽  
John W. Mellors

ABSTRACT The K65R mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) is selected in vitro by many d-nucleoside analog RT inhibitors (NRTI) but has been rarely detected in treated patients. In recent clinical trials, the K65R mutation has emerged frequently in patients experiencing virologic failure on antiretroviral combinations that do not include 3′-azidothymidine (AZT). The reason for this change is uncertain. To gain insight, we examined trends in the frequency of K65R in a large genotype database, the association of K65R with thymidine analog mutations (TAMs) and other NRTI mutations, and the viral susceptibility profile of HIV-1 with K65R alone and in combination with TAMs. Among >60,000 clinical samples submitted for genotype analysis that contained one or more NRTI resistance mutations, the frequency of K65R increased from 0.4% in 1998 to 3.6% in 2003. Among samples with K65R, a strong negative association was evident with the TAMs M41L, D67N, L210W, T215Y/F, and K219Q/E (P < 0.005) but not with other NRTI mutations, including the Q151M complex. This suggested that K65R and TAMs are antagonistic. To test this possibility, we generated recombinant HIV-1 encoding K65R in two different TAM backgrounds: M41L/L210W/T215Y and D67N/K70R/T215F/K219Q. K65R reduced AZT resistance from >50-fold to <2.5-fold in both backgrounds. In addition, TAMs antagonized the phenotypic effect of K65R, reducing resistance to tenofovir, abacavir, 2′,3′-dideoxycytidine, dideoxyinosine, and stavudine. In conclusion, K65R and TAMs exhibit bidirectional phenotypic antagonism. This antagonism likely explains the negative association of these mutations in genotype databases, the rare emergence of K65R with antiretroviral therapies that contain AZT, and its more frequent emergence with combinations that exclude AZT.


2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 2648-2656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis R. Miranda ◽  
Matthias Götte ◽  
Daniel R. Kuritzkes

ABSTRACT Thymidine analog mutations (TAMs) in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) confer resistance to zidovudine (AZT) by increasing the rate of ATP-dependent phosphorolysis of the terminal nucleotide monophosphate (primer unblocking). By contrast, the L74V mutation, which confers resistance to didanosine, sensitizes HIV-1 to AZT and partially restores AZT susceptibility when present together with one or more TAMs. To compare rates of primer unblocking in RTs carrying different clusters of TAMs and to explore the biochemical mechanism by which L74V affects AZT susceptibility, ATP-mediated rescue of AZT-blocked DNA synthesis was assayed using a series of purified recombinant RTs. Rates of primer unblocking were higher in the 67N/70R/219Q RT than in the 41L/210W/215Y enzyme and were similar to rates observed with an RT carrying six TAMs (41L/67N/70R/210W/215Y/219Q). The presence of 74V in an otherwise wild-type RT reduced the rate of primer unblocking to a degree similar to that observed with the M184V mutation for lamivudine resistance, which also sensitizes HIV-1 to AZT. Introduction of 74V into RTs carrying TAMs partially counteracted the effect of TAMs on the rate of primer unblocking. The effect of 74V was less marked than that of the 184V mutation in the 67N/70R/219Q and 41L/210W/215Y RTs but similar in the RT carrying six TAMs. These results demonstrate that L74V enhances AZT susceptibility by reducing the extent of its removal by ATP-dependent phosphorolysis and provides further evidence for a common mechanism by which mutations conferring resistance to didanosine and lamivudine sensitize HIV-1 to AZT.


2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 731-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Maguire ◽  
Denise Shortino ◽  
Astrid Klein ◽  
Wendy Harris ◽  
Varsha Manohitharajah ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Previous data have indicated that the development of resistance to amprenavir, an inhibitor of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease, is associated with the substitution of valine for isoleucine at residue 50 (I50V) in the viral protease. We present further findings from retrospective genotypic and phenotypic analyses of plasma samples from protease inhibitor-naïve and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-experienced patients who experienced virological failure while participating in a clinical trial where they had been randomized to receive either amprenavir or indinavir in combination with NRTIs. Paired baseline and on-therapy isolates from 31 of 48 (65%) amprenavir-treated patients analyzed demonstrated the selection of protease mutations. These mutations fell into four distinct categories, characterized by the presence of either I50V, I54L/I54M, I84V, or V32I+I47V and often included accessory mutations, commonly M46I/L. The I50V and I84V genotypes displayed the greatest reductions in susceptibility to amprenavir, although each of the amprenavir-selected genotypes conferred little or no cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors. There was a significant association, for both amprenavir and indinavir, between preexisting baseline resistance to NRTIs subsequently received during the study and development of protease mutations (P = 0.014 and P = 0.031, respectively). Our data provide a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms by which amprenavir resistance develops during clinical use and present evidence that resistance to concomitant agents in the treatment regimen predisposes to the development of mutations associated with protease inhibitor resistance and treatment failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document