scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid Compared to Linezolid and Five Other Antimicrobial Agents against 332 Anaerobic Isolates, Including Bacteroides fragilis Group, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Veillonella Species

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellie J. C. Goldstein ◽  
C. Vreni Merriam ◽  
Diane M. Citron

ABSTRACT Tedizolid’s anaerobic activity is unappreciated. In this study, it was active against all 332 anaerobic isolates tested at ≤2 μg/ml except Bilophila wadsworthia and was more active than linezolid against Bacteroides fragilis group species (MIC90, 1 μg/ml versus 2 to 4 μg/ml). Tedizolid was active against Gram-positive anaerobes (MIC90 for clostridia, 0.25 to 1 μg/ml; MIC90 for anaerobic cocci, ≤0.06 to 0.25 μg/ml). Our data coupled with clinical reports indicate that clinicians should consider its use in mixed infections where Staphylococcus aureus and anaerobes are involved.

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale M. Mazer ◽  
Carol Young ◽  
Linda M. Kalikin ◽  
Theodore Spilker ◽  
John J. LiPuma

ABSTRACT We tested the activities of ceftolozane-tazobactam and 13 other antimicrobial agents against 221 strains of Burkholderia cepacia complex and Burkholderia gladioli. Most strains (82%) were cultured from persons with cystic fibrosis, and most (85%) were recovered since 2011. The ceftolozane-tazobactam MIC was ≤8 μg/ml for 77% of the strains. However, the MIC range was broad (≤0.5 to >64 μg/ml; MIC50/90, 2/32 μg/ml). Significant differences in susceptibility to some antimicrobial agents were observed between species.


1991 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 599-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. García-Rodriguez ◽  
J. E. García Sánchez ◽  
I. Trujillano ◽  
A. Sánchez de San Lorenzo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document