scholarly journals Segments of the POU domain influence one another's DNA-binding specificity.

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 455-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Aurora ◽  
W Herr

The ubiquitously expressed mammalian POU-domain protein Oct-1 specifically recognizes two classes of cis-acting regulatory elements that bear little sequence similarity, the octamer motif ATGCAAAT and the TAATGARAT motif. The related pituitary-specific POU protein Pit-1 also recognizes these two motifs but, unlike Oct-1, binds preferentially to the TAATGARAT motif. Yet in our assay, Pit-1 still binds octamer elements better than does the octamer motif-binding protein Oct-3. The POU domain is responsible for recognizing these diverse regulatory sequences through multiple DNA contacts that include the two POU subdomains, the POU-specific region, and the POU homeodomain. The DNA-binding properties of 10 chimeric POU domains, in which different POU-domain segments are derived from either Oct-1 or Pit-1, reveal a high degree of structural plasticity; these hybrid proteins all bind DNA well and frequently bind particular sites better than does either of the parental POU domains. In these chimeric POU domains, the POU-specific A and B boxes and the hypervariable POU linker can influence DNA-binding specificity. The surprising result is that the influence a particular segment has on DNA-binding specificity can be greatly affected by the origin of other segments of the POU domain and the sequence of the binding site. Thus, the broad but selective DNA-binding specificity of Oct-1 is conferred both by multiple DNA contacts and by dynamic interactions within the DNA-bound POU domain.

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 455-467
Author(s):  
R Aurora ◽  
W Herr

The ubiquitously expressed mammalian POU-domain protein Oct-1 specifically recognizes two classes of cis-acting regulatory elements that bear little sequence similarity, the octamer motif ATGCAAAT and the TAATGARAT motif. The related pituitary-specific POU protein Pit-1 also recognizes these two motifs but, unlike Oct-1, binds preferentially to the TAATGARAT motif. Yet in our assay, Pit-1 still binds octamer elements better than does the octamer motif-binding protein Oct-3. The POU domain is responsible for recognizing these diverse regulatory sequences through multiple DNA contacts that include the two POU subdomains, the POU-specific region, and the POU homeodomain. The DNA-binding properties of 10 chimeric POU domains, in which different POU-domain segments are derived from either Oct-1 or Pit-1, reveal a high degree of structural plasticity; these hybrid proteins all bind DNA well and frequently bind particular sites better than does either of the parental POU domains. In these chimeric POU domains, the POU-specific A and B boxes and the hypervariable POU linker can influence DNA-binding specificity. The surprising result is that the influence a particular segment has on DNA-binding specificity can be greatly affected by the origin of other segments of the POU domain and the sequence of the binding site. Thus, the broad but selective DNA-binding specificity of Oct-1 is conferred both by multiple DNA contacts and by dynamic interactions within the DNA-bound POU domain.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond K. Yengo ◽  
Elmar Nurmemmedov ◽  
Marjolein M Thunnissen

AbstractThe WT1 protein is a transcription factor that controls genes involved in cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. It has become increasing apparent that WT1 can act both as a tumor suppressor and oncogene in a tissue specific manner. This opposing role of WT1 is linked to its underlying transcriptional regulatory function, which involves the specific binding to its regulatory elements on gene promoters. WT1 binds DNA using it C-terminal domain made up of 4 C2H2-typ zinc fingers. This same zinc finger domain is used to bind RNA and proteins and it is still not clear how each zinc finger contributes to this promiscuous binding behavior. The molecular details of DNA binding by zinc finger 2 to 4 have been described but it remains to be determined whether or not zinc finger 1 binds DNA and if so whether it exhibits any DNA binding specificity. We present the X-ray structures of zinc finger 1 to 3 bound to a 9 bp and an 8 bp DNA. The two structures refined to 1.7 Å, show no DNA binding specificity for zinc finger 1. The only DNA interactions involving zinc finger 1 are crystal-packing interactions with a symmetry related molecule. In the structure of zinc finger 1 to 3 bound to the 9 bp DNA we observe a shift in the DNA binding positions for zinc fingers 2 and 3. These structures provide molecular detail into the WT1-DNA interaction showing that zinc finger 1 only modestly contributes to DNA binding affinity through transient interactions. The dislocation of zinc finger 2 and 3 emphasizes the importance of zinc finger 4 for maintaining gene transcriptional specificity.


1992 ◽  
Vol 11 (13) ◽  
pp. 4993-5003 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.P. Verrijzer ◽  
M.J. Alkema ◽  
W.W. van Weperen ◽  
H.C. Van Leeuwen ◽  
M.J. Strating ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document