Policy development and uncertainty in earthquake risk in the New Madrid seismic zone

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay H. Crandell
Keyword(s):  
Policy Development ◽  
Earthquake Risk ◽  
New Madrid Seismic Zone ◽  
Seismic Zone ◽  
New Madrid

3D GEOLOGIC MAPPING IN AND ADJACENT TO THE NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE, CENTRAL UNITED STATES

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renee M. Reichenbacher ◽  
◽  
Valarie Harrison ◽  
Taylor Andrew Weathers ◽  
Roy B. Van Arsdale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
New Madrid Seismic Zone ◽  
Seismic Zone ◽  
Geologic Mapping ◽  
Central United States ◽  
New Madrid

POSSIBLE SURFACE WARPING ALONG THE BOOTHEEL FAULT REVEALED FROM LIDAR, NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE, CENTRAL US

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samia Noor ◽  
◽  
Randel Tom Cox ◽  
Robert Smalley ◽  
Md Rizwanul Hasan
Keyword(s):  
New Madrid Seismic Zone ◽  
Seismic Zone ◽  
New Madrid

Stream response to repeated coseismic folding, Tiptonville dome, New Madrid seismic zone

Geomorphology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 43 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 313-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J Guccione ◽  
K Mueller ◽  
J Champion ◽  
S Shepherd ◽  
S.D Carlson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New Madrid Seismic Zone ◽  
Seismic Zone ◽  
Stream Response ◽  
New Madrid

Reply to R. Street's “comment on periodic energy release in the new madrid seismic zone'”

1987 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 1869-1869
Author(s):  
Dean J. Mento ◽  
C. Patrick Ervin ◽  
L. D. McGinnis
Keyword(s):  
Energy Release ◽  
New Madrid Seismic Zone ◽  
Seismic Zone ◽  
New Madrid

The June 13, 1975 earthquake and its relationship to the New Madrid seismic zone

1977 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-218
Author(s):  
R. B. Herrmann ◽  
G. W. Fischer ◽  
J. E. Zollweg
Keyword(s):  
Parameter Estimation ◽  
Seismic Moment ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Eastern North America ◽  
New Madrid Seismic Zone ◽  
Seismic Zone ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Consistent Solution ◽  
New Madrid

abstract The June 13, 1975 earthquake in the New Madrid seismic zone produced the first recorded strong-motion accelerograms for an event in the region, as well as the largest recorded accelerations to date for any event in eastern North America. The peak strong-motion values obtained from an analysis of the accelerograms are the following: amax = 43 cm/sec2, vmax = 1 cm/sec and dmax = 0.05 cm for the longitudinal S88°W component; amax = 31 cm/sec2, vmax = 0.6 cm/sec and dmax = 0.01 cm for the DOWN component; amax = 64 cm/sec2, vmax = 1.6 cm/sec2, and dmax = 0.09 cm for the tangential S02°E component. Source parameter estimation using long-period surface waves, Lg spectra, P-wave first motions and the integrated accelerograms leads to a consistent solution. The seismic moment is estimated to be 4E21 dyne-cm and the corner period 0.6 sec. The corner period-seismic moment pair for this event agrees with the regional scaling of these parameters observed by Street et al. (1975).

Evidence for contemporary vertical fault displacement from precise leveling data near the New Madrid seismic zone, western Kentucky

1981 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 1933-1942
Author(s):  
F. Steve Schilt ◽  
Robert E. Reilinger
Keyword(s):  
Surface Deformation ◽  
Apparent Movement ◽  
Normal Fault ◽  
Elastic Half Space ◽  
Focal Mechanisms ◽  
New Madrid Seismic Zone ◽  
Seismic Zone ◽  
The Times ◽  
Western Kentucky ◽  
New Madrid

Abstract Relative vertical displacements of bench marks in extreme western Kentucky have been determined by comparison of successive leveling surveys in 1947 and 1968. The resulting pattern of apparent surface deformation shows steep offset which can be closely modeled by a normal fault buried in an elastic half-space. The offset is located near the northern boundary of the Mississippi Embayment and the New Madrid seismic zone, an area where faults have previously been inferred on the basis of both geological and geophysical evidence. If the apparent movement is due to slip along a fault, several lines of evidence (regional structure, earthquake data, and lineations) suggest that the postulated fault trends NNE. Thirteen earthquakes were recorded in this area between the times of leveling; focal mechanisms exist for three of these. The nearest of these three focal mechanisms to the leveling offset implies normal faulting. The magnitude of the earthquake, however, appears to be too small to account for the amount of slip required by the fault model. Thus the apparent deformation may have accumulated with several undetected small earthquakes, or gradually as aseismic creep.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document