Water resurge at marine-target impact craters analyzed with a combination of low-velocity impact experiments and numerical simulations

Author(s):  
Jens Ormö ◽  
Alain Lepinette ◽  
Erik Sturkell ◽  
Maurits Lindström ◽  
Kevin R. Housen ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 023101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaoqun Jiang ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Qiancheng Liu ◽  
Xianming Zhou ◽  
S. N. Luo

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Chidester ◽  
Frank Garcia ◽  
Kevin S. Vandersall ◽  
Craig M. Tarver ◽  
Louis Ferranti

2022 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 108720
Author(s):  
Hosein Hasan-nezhad ◽  
Mojtaba Yazdani ◽  
Mohsen Jeddi

Author(s):  
Julie Brisset ◽  
Joshua Colwell ◽  
Adrienne Dove ◽  
Sumayya Abukhalil ◽  
Christopher Cox ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam S. Chandekar ◽  
Ajit D. Kelkar

In the present study experimental and numerical investigations were carried out to predict the low velocity impact response of four symmetric configurations: 10 ply E Glass, 10 ply AS4 Carbon, and two Hybrid combinations with 1 and 2 outer plies of E Glass and 8 and 6 inner plies of Carbon. All numerical investigations were performed using commercial finite element software, LS-DYNA. The test coupons were manufactured using the low cost Heated Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding (H-VARTM©) technique. Low velocity impact testing was carried out using an Instron Dynatup 8250 impact testing machine. Standard 6 × 6 Boeing fixture was used for all impact experiments. Impact experiments were performed over progressive damage, that is, from incipient damage till complete failure of the laminate in six successive impact energy levels for each configuration. The simulation results for the impact loading were compared with the experimental results. For both nonhybrid configurations, it was observed that the simulated results were in good agreement with the experimental results, whereas, for hybrid configurations, the simulated impact response was softer than the experimental response. Maximum impact load carrying capacity was also compared for all four configurations based on their areal density. It was observed that Hybrid262 configuration has superior impact load to areal density ratio.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (supp01) ◽  
pp. 1344004 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. FLORES-JOHNSON ◽  
Q. M. LI ◽  
LUMING SHEN

Numerical simulations of quasi-static indentation and low velocity impact of low density polymethacrylimide (PMI) Rohacell 51 WF foam using indenters with different nose shapes (conical, truncated-conical, hemi-spherical and flat) were carried out using the finite element code LS-DYNA. A 2D axisymmetric model was generated. A strain-rate dependent material model and r-adaptive remeshing were used for low velocity impact simulations. Numerical predictions matched the available experimental data very well. Moreover, the predicted resistance force closely matched the empirical results. The results demonstrated the ability of the model to reproduce the deformation mechanisms of the penetration process of Rohacell 51 WF foam.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 626-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxun Zhang ◽  
Qinghua Qin ◽  
Shangjun Chen ◽  
Yan Yang ◽  
Yang Ye ◽  
...  

This paper uses the analytical, experimental and numerical methods to investigate the low-velocity impact response of fully clamped multilayer sandwich beams with metal foam cores struck by a heavy mass. Using the quasi-static method, analytical solutions for dynamic response of the fully clamped multilayer sandwich beams are derived including the interaction between bending and stretching induced by large deflections. Effects of local denting and core strength on the overall bending are considered. The low-velocity impact experiments and numerical calculations are carried out to validate the analytical model. The present analytical model captures experimental and numerical results reasonably. It is shown that the energy absorption of multilayer sandwich beams increases with decrease of multilayer factor and increase of the core strength.


Icarus ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 205 (2) ◽  
pp. 702-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Setoh ◽  
A.M. Nakamura ◽  
P. Michel ◽  
K. Hiraoka ◽  
Y. Yamashita ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document