PLUME-SPOTTING: DERIVING THE ABSOLUTE MOTION OF HOTSPOTS AND PLATES

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Wessel ◽  
◽  
Guillaume Bodinier ◽  
Clinton P. Conrad
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Robert Rynasiewicz

In the Scholium to the Definitions at the beginning of the Principia, Newton distinguishes absolute time, space, place, and motion from their relative counterparts. He argues that they are indeed ontologically distinct, in that the absolute quantity cannot be reduced to some particular category of the relative, as Descartes had attempted by defining absolute motion to be relative motion with respect to immediately ambient bodies. Newton’s rotating bucket experiment, rather than attempting to show that absolute motion exists, is one of five arguments from the properties, causes, and effects of motion. These arguments attempt to show that no such program can succeed, and thus that true motion can be adequately analyzed only by invoking immovable places, that is, the parts of absolute space.


Author(s):  
Alexander Pastukhov ◽  
Lisa Koßmann ◽  
Claus-Christian Carbon

AbstractWhen several multistable displays are viewed simultaneously, their perception is synchronized, as they tend to be in the same perceptual state. Here, we investigated the possibility that perception may reflect embedded statistical knowledge of physical interaction between objects for specific combinations of displays and layouts. We used a novel display with two ambiguously rotating gears and an ambiguous walker-on-a-ball display. Both stimuli produce a physically congruent perception when an interaction is possible (i.e., gears counterrotate, and the ball rolls under the walker’s feet). Next, we gradually manipulated the stimuli to either introduce abrupt changes to the potential physical interaction between objects or keep it constant despite changes in the visual stimulus. We characterized the data using four different models that assumed (1) independence of perception of the stimulus, (2) dependence on the stimulus’s properties, (3) dependence on physical configuration alone, and (4) an interaction between stimulus properties and a physical configuration. We observed that for the ambiguous gears, the perception was correlated with the stimulus changes rather than with the possibility of physical interaction. The perception of walker-on-a-ball was independent of the stimulus but depended instead on whether participants responded about a relative motion of two objects (perception was biased towards physically congruent motion) or the absolute motion of the walker alone (perception was independent of the rotation of the ball). None of the two experiments supported the idea of embedded knowledge of physical interaction.


Nature ◽  
1934 ◽  
Vol 133 (3353) ◽  
pp. 162-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAYTON C. MILLER

2006 ◽  
Vol 460 (2) ◽  
pp. L27-L30 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. R. Bedin ◽  
G. Piotto ◽  
G. Carraro ◽  
I. R. King ◽  
J. Anderson
Keyword(s):  

1988 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. K. Bennighof ◽  
L. Meirovitch

This paper is concerned with the problem of controlling the vibration of a distributed system with a support undergoing significant persistent motion. Because of practical considerations, the control is carried out by discrete actuators and sensors. The system is discretized by a new Rayleigh-Ritz approach in which the generalized coordinates represent actual displacements at a given number of points of the system. The control is separated into two parts, one designed to mitigate the effect of the moving support on the absolute motion of the system and the other designed to minimize the remaining absolute motion. A numerical example illustrating the approach is presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document