The conversion tectonics from spreading to subduction: Paleostress analysis of dike swarms during the subduction initiation in the Oman Ophiolite

2019 ◽  
Vol 132 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 1333-1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susumu Umino ◽  
Yuki Kusano ◽  
Atsushi Yamaji ◽  
Takahiro Fudai ◽  
Akihiro Tamura ◽  
...  

Abstract We present paleostress analyses of dike swarms intruded during the subduction initiation in the northern Oman Ophiolite to understand the tectonomagmatic environment. Five swarms of subparallel dikes extending WNW-ESE are 1–5 km in width and are spaced every 5 km N-S. Each swarm has a core of 100% sheeted dikes 1–2 km in width, which emanated from the dunite-wherlite-clinopyroxenite-gabbronorite-diorite-tonalite complexes below and intruded through V1 and into V2 extrusive rocks. Individual dike strikes are varied but generally subparallel to the overall trend of the swarm. Paleostress analyses indicate subvertical σ1, ∼σ2, and subhorizontal σ3 with high magma pressures, resulted in the mutually intrusive, extensional shear dikes and abrupt changes in dike strike at high angles. These occurrences suggest intrusions under a more compressive environment compared to the extensional stress field that formed the N-S–striking sheeted dikes of V1 spreading stage. Most E-W–striking dikes possess both boninitic and tholeiitic geochemistry. The latter resemble the V1 flows and dikes with affinities of mid-ocean ridge basalt. Some tholeiitic dikes strike N-S, which are mutually intrusive to E-W–striking dikes. Tholeiitic dikes are more intensely altered than boninite, suggesting their older ages. Conversion of the stress field from a N-S–running spreading axis to inextensional E-W–running rift zones associated with the change in magma geochemistry agree with the relatively compressive V2 arc above a forced subduction zone, which originated from intraoceanic thrusting caused by the clockwise rotation of a microplate including the future northern ophiolite.

Author(s):  
Xiao-Han Gong ◽  
Ji-Feng Xu ◽  
Ren-Deng Shi ◽  
Ben-Xun Su ◽  
Qi-Shuai Huang ◽  
...  

Garnet-bearing peridotites commonly occur in the deeper parts of mature or thickened oceanic lithosphere, and are rarely exhumed and emplaced onto the seafloor. The Purang ophiolitic peridotites in south Tibet contain rare symplectite pseudomorphs after garnet, offering a unique window into the still poorly understood evolution of the deep oceanic lithosphere. Here, integrated petrologic and Os-Li isotopic data are used to constrain the evolution and dynamics of emplacement for these garnet peridotite protoliths. The Purang peridotites show wide variations of chemical compositions (spinel Cr#: 0.2−0.8) and Os model ages (up to 2.0 Ga), thus representing a piece of heterogeneous oceanic mantle lithosphere. Dunite channels show two distinctive groups of Cr# of spinels and Os-isotope compositions, with the low- to medium-Cr# (0.2−0.6) and high-Cr# (0.7−0.8) dunites reflecting the reaction of host lherzolites/harzburgites with percolating mid-ocean ridge basalt−like and boninitic melts, respectively. This confirms recent subduction initiation-related melt percolation in the Purang peridotites. Coexisting olivines and pyroxenes in the peridotites show systematic Li elemental and isotopic disequilibrium, suggesting fast cooling of the peridotites to Li closure temperature shortly after the melt percolations, likely during exhumation of the peridotites onto the seafloor. This supports a close link between subduction initiation and tectonic emplacement of the Purang peridotites. Combined with other geological evidence, we suggest the Purang peridotites may originate from the deep part of old, thick oceanic lithosphere of the Neo-Tethys. This thick oceanic lithosphere was progressively weakened and thinned likely during widespread plume-lithosphere interaction, triggering the transformation of garnet peridotite protoliths to spinel peridotites. Subsequently, initiation of a new subduction zone along the lithospheric weakness caused rapid ascent and emplacement of the Purang peridotites at a nascent forearc.


Nature ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 432 (7014) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Le Mée ◽  
Jacques Girardeau ◽  
Christophe Monnier

Lithos ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 234-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias G. Barth ◽  
Paul R.D. Mason ◽  
Gareth R. Davies ◽  
Martyn R. Drury

Geology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. MacLeod ◽  
C. Johan Lissenberg ◽  
L. E. Bibby

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian Drivenes ◽  
◽  
Ben Snook ◽  
Kurt Aasly

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yung Ping Lee ◽  
◽  
Jonathan E. Snow ◽  
Yongjun Gao
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 566 ◽  
pp. 116951
Author(s):  
Suzanne K. Birner ◽  
Elizabeth Cottrell ◽  
Jessica M. Warren ◽  
Katherine A. Kelley ◽  
Fred A. Davis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document