Artificial Selection for Reduced Fitness in Panmictic Populations of Drosophila melanogaster

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-417
Author(s):  
A. N. Stupnikova ◽  
Ju. V. Vasilyeva ◽  
T. V. Neretina ◽  
A. S. Kondrashov
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Artificial Selection ◽  
Selection For

scholarly journals Natural and Artificial Selection for Parasitoid Resistance in Drosophila melanogaster Leave Different Genetic Signatures

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Gerritsma ◽  
Kirsten M. Jalvingh ◽  
Carmen van de Beld ◽  
Jelmer Beerda ◽  
Louis van de Zande ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Artificial Selection ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Genetic Signatures

Cross-Resistance Following Artificial Selection for Increased Defense against Parasitoids in Drosophila melanogaster

Evolution ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 966 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. E. Fellowes ◽  
A. R. Kraaijeveld ◽  
H. C. J. Godfray
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Artificial Selection ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Selection For

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Regular Cycles of Intermittent Artificial Selection for A Quantitative Character in Drosophila Melanogaster

1968 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
KA Rathie ◽  
JSF Barker
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Artificial Selection ◽  
Abdominal Segment ◽  
Continuous Selection ◽  
Quantitative Character ◽  
Mass Selection ◽  
Selection Intensity ◽  
Bristle Number ◽  
Continuous Mass ◽  
Selection For

Regular cycles of intermittent mass selection have been compared with continuous mass selection at the same selection intensity for the quantitative trait of bristle number on one abdominal segment in a non-inbred strain of Drosophila melanogaster. All lines had 20 pairs of parents per generation. There were four replicates of each intermittent selection treatment, six of continuous selection at 20% selection intensity, and two at 10% selection intensity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document