Chromosomes of the Indian Muntjac (Muntiacus muntjak): Comeback

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 407-412
Author(s):  
L. S. Biltueva ◽  
P. L. Perelman ◽  
A. A. Proskuryakova ◽  
N. A. Lemskaya ◽  
N. A. Serdyukova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Indian Muntjac ◽  
Muntiacus Muntjak

Comparative genomic analysis links karyotypic evolution with genomic evolution in the Indian Muntjac (Muntiacus muntjak vaginalis)

Chromosoma ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 115 (6) ◽  
pp. 427-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Zhou ◽  
Ling Huang ◽  
Jianguo Zhang ◽  
Xiangyi Zhao ◽  
Qingpeng Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Analysis ◽  
Comparative Genomic Analysis ◽  
Comparative Genomic ◽  
Karyotypic Evolution ◽  
Genomic Evolution ◽  
Indian Muntjac ◽  
Muntiacus Muntjak

Comparative Chromosome Painting in Mammals: Human and the Indian Muntjac (Muntiacus muntjak vaginalis)

Genomics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 396-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengtang Yang ◽  
Stefan Müller ◽  
Reinhard Just ◽  
Malcolm A. Ferguson-Smith ◽  
Johannes Wienberg
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Painting ◽  
Comparative Chromosome Painting ◽  
Indian Muntjac ◽  
Muntiacus Muntjak

CONSTITUTIVE HETEROCHROMATIN OF INDIAN MUNTJAC CHROMOSOMES REVEALED BY DNASE TREATMENT AND A C-BANDING TECHNIQUE

1974 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Kato ◽  
K. Tsuchiya ◽  
T. H. Yosida
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Constriction ◽  
Constitutive Heterochromatin ◽  
Banding Technique ◽  
Size Difference ◽  
Indian Muntjac ◽  
C Banding ◽  
Dnase Treatment ◽  
Muntiacus Muntjak ◽  
Secondary Constrictions ◽  
Constriction Region

A karyotype of a female Indian muntjac, Muntiacus muntjak vaginalis, was described. The karyotype was unique in that No. 1 and No. 3 homologous pairs were heteromorphic with respect to the size of their secondary constrictions. In these pairs, one of the homologs always had a longer secondary constriction than that on the corresponding homolog. Heterochromatin in the secondary constriction region was visualized with difficulty by a C-banding technique, but was demonstrated clearly by a DNase treatment followed by Giemsa staining, which also revealed the size difference of the secondary constriction. Centromeric constitutive heterochromatin of No. 1 chromosome was also found to differ in size between the homologs. On the basis of the heteromorphic character of No. 3 chromosome, or an X-autosome complex, it was possible to confirm autoradiographically that X-inactivation had occurred at random.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document