scholarly journals Improved renal allograft survival for pre-emptive paediatric renal transplant recipients in the UK

2021 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2020-321277
Author(s):  
Matko Marlais ◽  
Kate Martin ◽  
Stephen D Marks
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Renal Allograft ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Allograft Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Donor Type ◽  
The Uk

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate whether being on dialysis at the time of renal transplantation affected renal allograft survival in paediatric renal transplant recipients (pRTRs).MethodsRetrospective study of UK Transplant Registry (National Health Service Blood and Transplant) data on all children (aged <18 years) receiving a kidney-only transplant from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2015. Kaplan-Meier estimates of patient and renal allograft survival calculated and Cox regression modelling accounting for donor type. The relationship between time on dialysis and renal allograft survival was examined.Results2038 pRTRs were analysed: 607 (30%) were pre-emptively transplanted, 789 (39%) and 642 (32%) on peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis, respectively, at the time of transplantation. Five-year renal allograft survival was significantly better in the pre-emptively transplanted group (90.6%) compared with those on peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis (86.4% and 85.7%, respectively; p=0.02). After accounting for donor type, there was a significantly lower hazard of 5-year renal allograft failure in pre-emptively transplanted children (HR 0.742, p=0.05). Time spent on dialysis pre-transplant negatively correlated with renal allograft survival (p=0.002). There was no significant difference in 5-year renal allograft survival between children who were on dialysis for less than 6 months and children transplanted pre-emptively (87.5% vs 90.5%, p=0.25).ConclusionsPre-emptively transplanted children have improved 5-year renal allograft survival, compared with children on dialysis at the time of transplantation. Although increased time spent on dialysis correlated with poorer renal allograft survival, there was no evidence that short periods of dialysis pre-transplant affected renal allograft survival.

scholarly journals MO065DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA OF HUMORAL REJECTION IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS WITH PRE-EXISTING ANTI-HLA ANTIBODIES BASED ON SENTINEL SKIN FLAP BIOPSY

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Sadouski ◽  
Aleh Kalachyk ◽  
Alexadr Nosik ◽  
Aliaksei Narbin ◽  
Anna Startsava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Vascular Bundle ◽  
Renal Allograft ◽  
Skin Flap ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Humoral Rejection ◽  
Hla Antibodies ◽  
Kidney Allograft

Abstract Background and Aims Twenty years of transplantation of composite vascularised allografts have revealed the high immunogenicity of the constituent parts, especially the skin.Several researchers have proposed the use of vascular stalk flaps, which allow to performe skin biopsy and diagnose rejection without biopsy of the transplanted solid organ.Pre-existing anti-HLA antibodies represent a serious immunological barrier to successful kidney transplantation.We are not aware of any studies on the diagnosis of antibody-associated acute kidney allograft rejection from deceased donors in recipients with pre-existing antibodies, based on morphological examination of a sentinel skin flap on a vascular stalk. The Aim: To determine the morphological features of humoral rejection in renal transplant recipients with pre-existing anti-HLA antibodies based on sentinel skin flap biopsy. Method Three skin-kidney allografts recipients underwent skin flap biopsy on 2nd day after transplantation. A kidney allograft biopsy was performed on day 7, 30, 60, 90.The results of morphological studies are presented using the Banff classification of renal allograft and skin allograft pathology. All recipients were female; 35, 44, and 57 years old. Two patients were re-transplanted and the main cause of CKD was chronic glomerulonephritis. The third patient, with congenital abnormality of the urinary tract, received her first graft.Pre-existing anti-HLA antibody levels before transplantation were 50%, 60%, 80%, respectively. Results All recipients showed signs of humoral rejection of the skin flap with thrombosis of the feeding vascular bundle, phlebitis, predominantly intimal arteritis with median necrosis, detachment and areactive necrosis of epidermis and epithelium of skin appendages. Clinical rejection, similar to the algorithm proposed by Etra J.W. et al. to assess preclinical skin rejection in an animal model (2019), was interpreted as G2 in two cases and G3 in one case. The Banff classification of the skin flap offers a qualitative assessment of certain biopsy parameters, while the kidney graft has qualitative-quantitative criteria for assessing rejection. When comparing the two classifications, a quantitative gradation of pathological changes in the skin flap according to the parameter of intimal arteritis (v) and immunoreactivity of the C4d marker similar to renal rejection was possible. In histological examination of skin flap biopsies, the degree of vasculitis was assessed in a large feeding artery: in all three cases this parameter was equal to v3. C4d expression was analyzed in the endothelium of microcirculatory blood vessels of the dermis and hypodermis: C4d1 in one case and C4d3 in the other two. The analysis of renal allograft biopsies revealed signs of humoral rejection (v1) only at day 30 in two recipients whose C4d expression in the skin and hypodermis was strong (C4d3). Conclusion Antibody-mediated rejection of a vascularized sentinel skin flap in recipients with combined skin-kidney transplantation is characterized by vasculitis affecting a core vascular bundle in the form of endarteritis with necrosis of media,phlebitis and associated thrombosis.Further studies are required to determine the feasibility of using a vascular stalked skin flap in the diagnosis of humoral rejection after renal transplantation.

P1763TUBERCULOSIS IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECEPIENTS - DO RITUXIMAB AND OTHER IMMUNOSUPRESSION HAVE A ROLE?

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupma Kaul ◽  
Dharmendra Bhaduria ◽  
Narayan Prasad ◽  
Amit Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplantation ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Immunosuppressive Agents ◽  
Induction Agent ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Mean Time

Abstract Background and Aims Rituximab is an anti CD 20 agent used widely in renal transplant recipients. Its use is associated with various infections;however, its association with Tuberculosis (TB) is not well established and has not been studied in post renal transplantation patients. Method This is a single centre, retrospective analysis of 56 renal transplant recipients who received rituximab for various reasons and 287 post renal transplant patients who did not receive rituximab during the study period from January 2013 to June 2017. The association between use of rituximab and incidence of TB was studied. Other factors associated with tuberculosis were also investigated. Results Baseline characteristics were similar in both the groups. Mean time for occurrence of TB was 18.4 + 10.6 months after renal transplantation. Rituximab use was not significantly associated with tuberculosis or any other infection. Higher number of rejection episodes (60% vs 32.72%, p=0.029) was the only factor associated with greater incidence of TB. However, no specific type of rejection was associated with tuberculosis. Use of plasmapheresis in post transplant period for treatment of humoral rejections was associated with significantly higher incidence of TB (33.33% vs 13.41%, p=0.031), however when pre- transplant plasmapheresis was also considered, there was no significant difference. The choice of induction agent was not associated with higher incidence of TB. Conclusion Use of rituximab is not associated with higher incidence of TB when compared to other immunosuppressive agents. Routine screening and prophylaxis may not be advisable especially in a country like India with high prevalence of TB; as it will further delay transplantation and may adversely affect the outcome of the patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document