The Electrolytic Treatment of Uterine Tumours

BMJ ◽  
1887 ◽  
Vol 2 (1403) ◽  
pp. 1130-1130
Author(s):  
W. S. Playfair
2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 1093-1097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangzhou LIU ◽  
Jianming WANG ◽  
Jianqing ZHANG ◽  
Chunan CAO

Chemosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 234 ◽  
pp. 132-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Muñoz-Morales ◽  
C. Sáez ◽  
P. Cañizares ◽  
M.A. Rodrigo

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 183-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.P. Buzzini ◽  
A.J. Motheo ◽  
E.C. Pires

This paper presents results from exploratory experiments to test the technical feasibility of electrolytic treatment and coagulation followed by flocculation and sedimentation as post-treatment for the effluent of an UASB reactor treating simulated wastewater from an unbleached Kraft pulp mill. The electrolytic treatment provided up to 67% removal of the remaining COD and 98% of color removal. To achieve these efficiencies the energy consumption ranged from 14 Wh.l−1 to 20 Wh.l−1. The coagulation-flocculation treatment followed by settling required 350–400 mg.l−1 of aluminium sulfate. The addition of a high molecular weight cationic polymer enhanced both COD and color removal. Both post-treatment processes are technically feasible.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document