scholarly journals Concussion assessment in the emergency department: a preliminary study for a quality improvement project

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan A Mistry ◽  
Timothy H Rainer

BackgroundIn sport, concussion is assessed using the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) 5 and managed with return to play guidelines. Similar, user-friendly tools are rarely, if ever, used in the emergency department (ED).ObjectivesTo evaluate a modified concussion assessment tool designed for the ED (ED-CAT) in patients presenting with a head injury and to identify variables that predict 30-day reattendance.MethodsA preliminary, prospective, evaluation in a quality improvement project was conducted in one hospital in South Wales. Patients were recruited if they were over 13 years, and either did not have an ED-CT head scan or had a scan with no acute changes. The primary outcome was 30-day reattendance.Results40 patients were recruited, 18 of whom had a CT scan. 37 were discharged on the same day with advice, two discharged the next day and one was admitted. Three (7.5%) patients reattended the department. Predictors of reattendance were headache score (median 3.0 vs 5.0; p<0.05), pressure in head score (2.0 vs 5.0; p<0.05), nausea/vomiting score (1.0 vs 3.0; p<0.05), dizziness score (1.0 vs 4.0; p<0.05), blurred vision score (0 vs 4.0; p<0.01), balance problems score (0 vs 4.0; p<0.05), sensitivity to light and confusion score (0 vs 4.0; p<0.01), orientation score (1. 0 vs 0; p<0.05) and immediate memory score (5.0 vs 4.0; p<0.05).ConclusionsKey symptoms and signs predicted 30-day reattendance. The ED-CAT requires validation and refinement in a larger population to produce a short, practical, user-friendly, relevant tool for ED head injury assessment.

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii8-ii13
Author(s):  
A Oates

Abstract Elderly patients transferred to community hospitals often have complex medical, social, psychological, functional and pharmacological backgrounds that require careful assessment in order to create and deliver a high quality, patient-centred care plan. Unfortunately, time pressures experienced by staff in acute hospitals can make Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) unfeasible for every patient. Moreover, junior members of the medical team may be unsure as to which aspects of a patient’s background and presentation constitute important elements of a CGA. Failure to recognise and document pertinent issues can lead to prolonged admissions, disjointed care and failed discharges. Admission to a community hospital presents a convenient ‘checkpoint’ in the patient’s hospital journey at which to undertake a CGA. Recording the relevant information in an effective clerking proforma when the patient is admitted ensures that this information is displayed clearly and in a way that is accessible to all members of the multidisciplinary team. The pre-existing clerking proforma at Amersham Community Hospital omitted several important elements of CGA (such as examination of feet and gait, assessment of mood, FRAX-UK score, creation of a problem list etc.) The aim of this quality improvement project was to create a thorough, yet user-friendly and time-efficient clerking proforma which incorporated the important components of CGA. Using BGS guidance and NICE quality standards, alongside suggestions from the medical team, the existing clerking proforma was adapted and reformed. After one month, feedback from the team was used to further improve the clerking proforma, ensuring that it was user-friendly, whilst meeting the standards set out by NICE and BGS. This was repeated as part of a second PDSA cycle. The improved clerking proforma enables junior doctors to undertake a thorough and holistic assessment, promoting efficient detection of issues and the delivery of a higher quality of care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shabana Shaheen ◽  
Muhammad Hameed ◽  
Yousef Essam Hassan Qabeel

The aim of this paper was to provide a Quality Improvement Tool for head injury patients.Using NICE guidance on head injury (Jan 2014), 9 salient points in history and 8 in examination were chosen to be audited and given a tabulated form. Key words: Quality Improvement, Head Injuries, NICE Guidelines


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document