ESRA19-0536 Paediatric regional anaesthesia to the rescue in the emergency department (ED); a nationwide survey, audit of major trauma centre patients and responsive quality improvement project

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Braunold ◽  
M Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Regional Anaesthesia ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Nationwide Survey ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Major Trauma Centre

scholarly journals 1403 Leadership and Teamwork in The Major Trauma Service – Implementation of A New Approach to Secondary Surveys

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Jefferies ◽  
A Walls ◽  
P McKeag ◽  
R Houston ◽  
D Kealey
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Orthopaedic Care ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Secondary Survey ◽  
Group 2

Abstract Aim Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) guidelines at a Major Trauma Centre in Northern Ireland state that all patients admitted with Major Trauma should have a secondary survey completed and documented within 24 hours of admission. Method All patients admitted with major trauma had their medical notes reviewed on discharge to look for evidence of a documented secondary survey. Two audit cycles were completed. The first from January 2018 to April 2018 (n = 38). Following a quality improvement project with specific interventions to improve compliance, including improved communication behaviours and the implementation of a revised trauma booklet, a second cycle was performed from October 2019 to January 2019 (n = 44) Results 58% of group 1 and 75% of group 2 had a documented secondary survey within 24 hours of admission. The interventions therefore resulted in an overall 17% increase in the number of secondary surveys completed within 24 hours. Patients admitted under Orthopaedic care had a significant improvement of 26% between cycles to 89% compliance. Cardiothoracics (33% to 40%), Neurosurgery (14% to 43%) and General Surgery (75% to 66%). Conclusions A quality improvement drive led by the Orthopaedic team involving the education of doctors, improving communication channels and the introduction of revised trauma documentation, resulted in a significant increase in the number of secondary surveys completed within 24 hours. Patients under the care of Orthopaedics were more likely to have a survey completed compared with other specialties. This highlights the need for more education and engagement of other specialities to increase compliance in secondary surveys.

A trauma quality improvement programme associated with improved patient outcomes: 21 years of experience at an Australian Major Trauma Centre

Injury ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 830-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M. Dinh ◽  
Kendall J. Bein ◽  
Belinda J. Gabbe ◽  
Christopher M. Byrne ◽  
Jeffrey Petchell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Years Of Experience ◽  
Quality Improvement Programme ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Improvement Programme

Pre-hospital and emergency department management of pelvic fractures and major trauma centre status: Has practice changed?

Trauma ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-211
Author(s):  
Jonathan Barnes ◽  
Philip Thomas ◽  
Ramsay Refaie ◽  
Andrew Gray
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Pelvic Fracture ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Pelvic Fractures ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Initial Imaging ◽  
One Year

Introduction Pelvic fractures are indicative of high-energy injuries and carry a significant morbidity and mortality and pelvic binders are used to stabilise them in both the pre-hospital and emergency department setting. Our unit gained major trauma centre status in April 2012 as part of a national programme to centralise trauma care and improve outcomes. This study investigated whether major trauma centre status led to a change in workload and clinical practice at our centre. Methods A retrospective analysis of all patients admitted with a pelvic fracture for the six-month periods before, after and at one-year following major trauma centre status designation. Data were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records and binder placement assessed using an accepted method. Patients with isolated pubic rami fractures were excluded. Results Overall, 6/16 (37.5%) pelvic fracture admissions had a binder placed pre-major trauma centre status, rising to 14/34 (41.2%) immediately post-major trauma centre status and 22/32 (68.8%) ( p = 0.025) one year later. Binders were positioned accurately in 4 patients (80%, one exclusion) pre-major trauma centre status, 12 (92.4%) post-major trauma centre status and 22 (100%) at one year. CT imaging was the initial imaging used in 9 (56.3%) patients pre-major trauma centre status, 29 (85.3%) ( p = 0.04) post-major trauma centre status and 27 (84.4%) at one year. Discussion Pelvic fracture admissions doubled following major trauma centre status. Computed tomography, as the initial imaging modality, increased significantly with major trauma centre status, likely a reflection of the increased resources made available with this change. Although binder application rates did not change immediately, a significant improvement was seen after one year, with binder accuracy increasing to 100%. This suggests that although changes in clinical practice often do not occur immediately, with the increased infrastructure and clinical exposure afforded through centralisation of trauma services, they will occur, ultimately leading to improvements in trauma patient care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document