scholarly journals PTH-141 Could upper GI Cancer Explain False Positive Faecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) Results in the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme?

Gut ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A268.2-A269
Author(s):  
G M Clifford ◽  
J Shenfine ◽  
H Jaretzke ◽  
C J Rees
Gut ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A36.1-A36 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Geraghty ◽  
J Snowball ◽  
P Butler ◽  
S Sarkar ◽  
R Blanks ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Becky White ◽  
Emily Power ◽  
Monika Ciurej ◽  
Siu Hing Lo ◽  
Katherine Nash ◽  
...  

This study evaluated the impact of three interventions on uptake of the guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) in Greater London. The interventions were designed to improve awareness and understanding of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) and assist stool sampling. Logistic regression analysis of BCSP London data (N=205,541invitees aged 60–74) compared uptake at 12 weeks between intervention groups and a control group, sent kits as usual between January-April 2013 and January-April 2014. An endorsement flyer, included with gFOBT kits, had no impact on uptake (P=0.68). In 60–69-year-olds, there was a small but significant increase in modelled uptake amongst invitees sent both the flyer and a kit enhancement pack compared with controls (45.1% versus 43.4%,OR=1.07,P=0.047). In North East London, the flyer together with outdoor advertising was associated with a small but significant increase (45.6% versus 43.4%,OR=1.09,P=0.027). The largest increases were seen when all three interventions (flyer, pack, and advertising) were combined (49.5% versus 43.4%,OR=1.28,P<0.001). The increased uptake in the intervention groups was largest in “first-timers” and smaller amongst previous nonresponders and previously screened invitees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document