scholarly journals PMO-3 The SPIT study: Creating a saliva based epigenetic biomarker panel to diagnose crohn’s disease

Author(s):  
Timothy Stone ◽  
Vanessa Ward ◽  
Avi Rosenfeld ◽  
Aine Hogan ◽  
Ami Ya’acov ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1113
Author(s):  
Tae Oh Kim ◽  
Joo Mi Yi ◽  
Jongha Park ◽  
Yong Eun Park ◽  
Jin Lee ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S304-S304
Author(s):  
A HOLMER ◽  
B Boland ◽  
S Singh ◽  
H Le ◽  
J Neill ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The endoscopic healing index (EHI, Monitr, Prometheus Biosciences, San Diego, CA) is a serum-based biomarker panel available for identifying mucosal inflammation in Crohn’s disease.[1] We aimed to study its performance for identifying mucosal inflammation in ulcerative colitis. Methods EHI was analysed on serum samples paired with endoscopies from adult patients (≥18 years) participating in a prospective biobank (June 2014 to December 2017). Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were used to assess the accuracy of EHI for endoscopic improvement (EI; Mayo endoscopic sub-score [MES] 0–1) and endoscopic remission (ER; MES 0). Sensitivity for EHI was calculated using a cut-off previously identified for Crohn’s disease which optimised performance for ruling out endoscopic activity (20 points). Alternative cut-offs were explored. Results A total of 114 patients were included, with an overall prevalence of 56% and 44% for EI and ER. The AUROC was 0.79 (95% CI 0.70–0.87) for EI and 0.70 (95% CI 0.61–0.80) for ER. A cut-off of 20 points had a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI 83–99%) for ruling out moderate to severe (MES 2–3) endoscopic activity, and a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI 72–92%) for ruling out mild to severe (MES 1–3) endoscopic activity. A cut off of 40 points or higher had > 90% specificity for ruling in moderate to severe (MES 2–3) or mild to severe (MES 1–3) endoscopic activity. (Table 1) Conclusion EHI has favourable accuracy in identifying the presence of mucosal inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis. Although it was not developed and validated for ulcerative colitis, further validation is warranted. Reference


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. S45-S46
Author(s):  
M. de Bruyn ◽  
T. Bessissow ◽  
T. Billiet ◽  
I. Cleynen ◽  
R. Kirkland ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S292-S293
Author(s):  
A HOLMER ◽  
B Boland ◽  
S Singh ◽  
J Neill ◽  
H Le ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ulcer healing is the primary endoscopic treatment target in Crohn’s disease (CD) in routine practice. A novel serum-based biomarker panel named endoscopic healing index (EHI, Monitr, Prometheus Biosciences, San Diego, CA) was developed and validated for identifying mucosal inflammation as assessed by the simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD).1 We aimed to define the operating characteristics of EHI in routine practice for mucosal ulcers specifically. Methods EHI was analysed on serum samples paired with endoscopies from adult patients (≥18 years) participating in a prospective biobank (June 2014 to December 2018). Patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis or an ileostomy were excluded. The performance of EHI for endoscopic disease activity was evaluated for subcomponents of SES-CD scores (0–60) including ulcer presence and size, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence of strictures. Diagnostic performance was assessed using previously identified cut-offs for optimal EHI performance in CD for ruling out endoscopic activity (20 points) and ruling in endoscopic activity (50 points). Logistic regression was performed to identify confounders of EHI (patient factors, disease characteristics) and for the strength of association between EHI and ulcers (presence, size). Results A total of 205 CD patients were included in the analysis (50% male, median age 37 years). EHI values were significantly higher with increasing ulcer size (p < 0.001). An EHI cut-off of 20 points exhibited modest sensitivity for ruling out any ulcers (85%, 95% CI 77–91), and large (0.5–20 mm) or very large (>20 mm) ulcers specifically (92%, 95% CI 84–97). An EHI cut-off of 50 points had modest specificity for ruling in the presence of any ulcers (85%, 95% CI 76–92), and large or very large ulcers specifically (87%, 95% CI 79–92). After accounting for the total extent of inflamed mucosa, extent of strictured mucosa, and disease location, each 20-point increase in EHI was independently associated with an incremental 1.7-fold increased probability for the presence of a large or very large ulcer (aOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1–2.6). Conclusion EHI values were associated with ulcer size independent of inflammatory or stricture burden, and accurately identified the presence of ulcers and large or very large ulcers specifically. A cut-off of 50 points can reliably rule in the presence of ulcers and allow for treatment adjustment without endoscopy. A cut-off of 20 points can reliably rule out the presence of ulcers and signal completion of treatment adjustment algorithms. Reference


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-694-S-695
Author(s):  
Ariela Holmer ◽  
Brigid Boland ◽  
Siddharth Singh ◽  
Jennifer Neill ◽  
Helen Le ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-428
Author(s):  
Magali de Bruyn ◽  
Talat Bessissow ◽  
Thomas Billiet ◽  
Isabelle Cleynen ◽  
Richard Kirkland ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 58-62
Author(s):  
G. Olaison ◽  
P. Andersson ◽  
P. Myrelid ◽  
K. Smedh ◽  
J. Soderholm ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document