scholarly journals 1403 Leadership and Teamwork in The Major Trauma Service – Implementation of A New Approach to Secondary Surveys

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Jefferies ◽  
A Walls ◽  
P McKeag ◽  
R Houston ◽  
D Kealey
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Orthopaedic Care ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Secondary Survey ◽  
Group 2

Abstract Aim Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) guidelines at a Major Trauma Centre in Northern Ireland state that all patients admitted with Major Trauma should have a secondary survey completed and documented within 24 hours of admission. Method All patients admitted with major trauma had their medical notes reviewed on discharge to look for evidence of a documented secondary survey. Two audit cycles were completed. The first from January 2018 to April 2018 (n = 38). Following a quality improvement project with specific interventions to improve compliance, including improved communication behaviours and the implementation of a revised trauma booklet, a second cycle was performed from October 2019 to January 2019 (n = 44) Results 58% of group 1 and 75% of group 2 had a documented secondary survey within 24 hours of admission. The interventions therefore resulted in an overall 17% increase in the number of secondary surveys completed within 24 hours. Patients admitted under Orthopaedic care had a significant improvement of 26% between cycles to 89% compliance. Cardiothoracics (33% to 40%), Neurosurgery (14% to 43%) and General Surgery (75% to 66%). Conclusions A quality improvement drive led by the Orthopaedic team involving the education of doctors, improving communication channels and the introduction of revised trauma documentation, resulted in a significant increase in the number of secondary surveys completed within 24 hours. Patients under the care of Orthopaedics were more likely to have a survey completed compared with other specialties. This highlights the need for more education and engagement of other specialities to increase compliance in secondary surveys.

Incremental cost-effectiveness of trauma service improvements for road trauma casualties: experience of an Australian major trauma centre

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 385
Author(s):  
Michael M. Dinh ◽  
Kendall J. Bein ◽  
Delia Hendrie ◽  
Belinda Gabbe ◽  
Christopher M. Byrne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Incremental Cost ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Improvement Programs

Objective The aim of the present study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of trauma service funding enhancements at an inner city major trauma centre. Methods The present study was a cost-effectiveness analysis using retrospective trauma registry data of all major trauma patients (injury severity score >15) presenting after road trauma between 2001 and 2012. The primary outcome was cost per life year gained associated with the intervention period (2007–12) compared with the pre-intervention period (2001–06). Incremental costs were represented by all trauma-related funding enhancements undertaken between 2007 and 2010. Risk adjustment for years of life lost was conducted using zero-inflated negative binomial regression modelling. All costs were expressed in 2012 Australian dollar values. Results In all, 876 patients were identified during the study period. The incremental cost of trauma enhancements between 2007 and 2012 totalled $7.91 million, of which $2.86 million (36%) was attributable to road trauma patients. After adjustment for important covariates, the odds of in-hospital mortality reduced by around half (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27, 0.82; P = 0.01). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was A$7600 per life year gained (95% CI A$5524, $19333). Conclusion Trauma service funding enhancements that enabled a quality improvement program at a single major trauma centre were found to be cost-effective based on current international and Australian standards. What is known about this topic? Trauma quality improvement programs have been implemented across most designated trauma hospitals in an effort to improve hospital care processes and outcomes for injured patients. These involve a combination of education and training, the use of audit and key performance indicators. What does this paper add? A trauma quality improvement program initiated at an Australian Major Trauma Centre was found to be cost-effective over 12 years with respect to years of life saved in road trauma patients. What are the implications for practitioners? The results suggest that adequate resourcing of trauma centres to enable quality improvement programs may be a cost-effective measure to reduce in-hospital mortality following road trauma.

A trauma quality improvement programme associated with improved patient outcomes: 21 years of experience at an Australian Major Trauma Centre

Injury ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 830-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M. Dinh ◽  
Kendall J. Bein ◽  
Belinda J. Gabbe ◽  
Christopher M. Byrne ◽  
Jeffrey Petchell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Years Of Experience ◽  
Quality Improvement Programme ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Improvement Programme

UP-03.135 Urology Trauma: Urban Battlefield: Our Experience of Establishing a Urology Trauma Service at a London Major Trauma Centre

Urology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. S388
Author(s):  
J. Makanjuola ◽  
G. Kooiman ◽  
C. Brown ◽  
P. Grange ◽  
D. Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
Major Trauma Centre

scholarly journals Management of open fractures of the lower limb during the COVID-19 pandemic: are the standards of treatment being maintained? a study from a major trauma centre in England

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajan Choudhary ◽  
Madhumita Gupta ◽  
Shahidul Haq ◽  
Wareth Maamoun
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Open Fractures ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Notable Increase ◽  
Definitive Surgery ◽  
Limb Fractures

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) has created an immense strain on the NHS. During the height of the pandemic, trauma services were affected by redeployment, reduced theatre capacity and staff illness, and COVID BOAST guidelines were introduced.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the standards of management of open fractures of the lower limb at a Major Trauma Centre in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare the same with the pre-pandemic period. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, timing and mechanism of initial debridement and definitive soft tissue and skeletal fixation were noted. Outcomes including duration of hospital stay, 30 day and 1 year mortality were also assessed.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results: </strong>There was an overall 21% reduction in admissions with open lower limb fractures during the pandemic period with a 48% reduction during the first lockdown. There was a significant reduction in time taken from Emergency Department presentation to first debridement as well as a notable increase in operating outside of regular theatre hours. There was little difference in operative technique used for skeletal or soft tissue management at initial and definitive surgery, though fewer cases were performed as a two stage procedure. There was no difference in amputation rate in the two years. Length of stay was reduced from 21 days to 17, and 30 day mortality remained the same.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Our study shows this Major Trauma Centre was able to provide a trauma service in accordance to the BOAST4 guidelines despite the increased pressures of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>

The sensitivity of pre-hospital and in-hospital tools for the identification of major trauma patients presenting to a major trauma centre.

2013 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-19
Author(s):  
D Potter ◽  
A Kehoe ◽  
JE Smith
Keyword(s):  
Major Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Trauma Network ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Injury Assessment ◽  
Trauma Response ◽  
Retrospective Database

AbstractThe identification of major trauma patients before arrival in hospital allows the activation of an appropriate trauma response. The Wessex triage tool (WTT) uses a combination of anatomical injury assessment and physiological criteria to identify patients with major trauma suitable for triage direct to a major trauma centre (MTC), and has been adopted by the South-West Peninsula Trauma Network (PTN). A retrospective database review, using the Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) database, was undertaken to identify a population of patients presenting to Derriford Hospital with an injury severity score (ISS) > 15. The WTT was then applied to this population to identify the sensitivity of the tool. The sensitivity of the WTT at identifying patients with an ISS>15 was 53%. One of the reasons for this finding was that elderly patients who are defined as having major trauma due to the nature of their injuries, but who did not have a mechanism to suggest they had sustained major trauma (such as a fall from standing height), were not identified by these triage tools. The implications of this are discussed.

Management of renal injury in a UK major trauma centre

Trauma ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31
Author(s):  
Robert Torrance ◽  
Abigail Kwok ◽  
David Mathews ◽  
Matthew Elliot ◽  
Andrew Baird ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Injury ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Renal Trauma ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Renal Injuries

Introduction This study reviews the type, severity, management and follow-up of renal trauma presenting to a major trauma centre in the northwest of England in the four years following inception of the major trauma centre. Given the recent introduction of major trauma centres nationally, research is needed within every specialty to ensure that the centralisation of services benefits all patients affected by these changes. Methods Patients presenting to Aintree University Hospital with renal trauma between June 2012 and June 2016 were identified using the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database. The data gathered retrospectively for each patient included mechanism of injury, injury severity score, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading, management of injury, and follow-up. Results Out of a total of 2595 trauma patients, 33 renal injuries were identified. The 31 patients who received imaging were classified according to AAST grading, with 8 Grade I (25.8%), 4 Grade II (12.9%), 8 Grade III (25.8%), 4 Grade IV (12.9%), and 7 Grade V (22.6%) injuries. Twenty-five out of the 30 surviving patients received conservative treatment, three patients received angioembolisation (AE), one patient received a laparotomy with renal suturing, and one patient required a nephrectomy. Of these 30 surviving patients, seven received urology follow-up in clinic (23%). Conclusion The findings appear to support the growing trend towards the conservative management of high-grade renal injuries, and provide further evidence for the value of AE in renal trauma. The success of AE in this study appears to support the centralisation of services in renal trauma; however, the low nephrectomy rate could be interpreted as suggestive of the opposite. The study revealed that improvements to follow-up are needed, and that further research should seek to inform the optimal radiological follow-up of high-grade renal injury.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document