Lower Bounds for On-line Graph Problems with Application to On-line Circuit and Optical Routing

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 354-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yair Bartal ◽  
Amos Fiat ◽  
Stefano Leonardi
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Gutowski ◽  
Jakub Kozik ◽  
Piotr Micek ◽  
Xuding Zhu

1994 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus M. Halldórsson ◽  
Mario Szegedy

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
Khaled Elbassioni

We consider the problem of pricing edges of a line graph so as to maximize the profit made from selling intervals to single-minded customers. An instance is given by a set E of n edges with a limited supply for each edge, and a set of m clients, where each client specifies one interval of E she is interested in and a budget B j which is the maximum price she is willing to pay for that interval. An envy-free pricing is one in which every customer is allocated an (possibly empty) interval maximizing her utility. Grandoni and Rothvoss (SIAM J. Comput. 2016) proposed a polynomial-time approximation scheme ( PTAS ) for the unlimited supply case with running time ( nm ) O ((1/ɛ) 1/ɛ ) , which was extended to the limited supply case by Grandoni and Wiese (ESA 2019). By utilizing the known hierarchical decomposition of doubling metrics , we give a PTAS with running time ( nm ) O (1/ ɛ 2 ) for the unlimited supply case. We then consider the limited supply case, and the notion of ɛ-envy-free pricing in which a customer gets an allocation maximizing her utility within an additive error of ɛ. For this case, we develop an approximation scheme with running time ( nm ) O (log 5/2 max e H e /ɛ 3 ) , where H e = B max ( e )/ B min ( e ) is the maximum ratio of the budgets of any two customers demanding edge e . This yields a PTAS in the uniform budget case, and a quasi-PTAS for the general case. The best approximation known, in both cases, for the exact envy-free pricing version is O (log c max ), where c max is the maximum item supply. Our method is based on the known hierarchical decomposition of doubling metrics, and can be applied to other problems, such as the maximum feasible subsystem problem with interval matrices.


Algorithmica ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart M. P. Jansen ◽  
Astrid Pieterse

Author(s):  
Guishen Wang ◽  
Kaitai Wang ◽  
Hongmei Wang ◽  
Huimin Lu ◽  
Xiaotang Zhou ◽  
...  

Local community detection algorithms are an important type of overlapping community detection methods. Local community detection methods identify local community structure through searching seeds and expansion process. In this paper, we propose a novel local community detection method on line graph through degree centrality and expansion (LCDDCE). We firstly employ line graph model to transfer edges into nodes of a new graph. Secondly, we evaluate edges relationship through a novel node similarity method on line graph. Thirdly, we introduce local community detection framework to identify local node community structure of line graph, combined with degree centrality and PageRank algorithm. Finally, we transfer them back into original graph. The experimental results on three classical benchmarks show that our LCDDCE method achieves a higher performance on normalized mutual information metric with other typical methods.


1977 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Lesniak-Foster ◽  
James E. Williamson

AbstractA set E of edges of a graph G is said to be a dominating set of edges if every edge of G either belongs to E or is adjacent to an edge of E. If the subgraph 〈E〉 induced by E is a trail T, then T is called a dominating trail of G. Dominating circuits are defined analogously. A sufficient condition is given for a graph to possess a spanning (and thus dominating) circuit and a sufficient condition is given for a graph to possess a spanning (and thus dominating) trail between each pair of distinct vertices. The line graph L(G) of a graph G is defined to be that graph whose vertex set can be put in one-to-one correspondence with the edge set of G in such a way that two vertices of L(G) are adjacent if and only if the corresponding edges of G are adjacent. The existence of dominating trails and circuits is employed to present results on line graphs and second iterated line graphs, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document