A distance-based analysis of habitat selection by American black bears (Ursus americanus) on the Bruce Peninsula, Ontario, Canada

2010 ◽  
Vol 88 (11) ◽  
pp. 1063-1076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martyn E. Obbard ◽  
Melissa B. Coady ◽  
Bruce A. Pond ◽  
James A. Schaefer ◽  
Frank G. Burrows

Because of their wide-ranging habits, conserving large carnivores such as American black bears ( Ursus americanus Pallas, 1780) often depends on understanding habitat needs beyond the boundary of protected areas. We studied habitat selection by black bears in the vicinity of Bruce Peninsula National Park, Ontario — a small, isolated population whose persistence appears dependent on habitat on lands outside the Park. We used an approach based on Euclidean distances to document seasonal habitat selection at two spatial scales and to identify candidate habitat types for protection. Adult females selected dense mixed forests to establish home ranges within the population range, whereas subadults and yearlings selected dense deciduous forests. Within home ranges, adults selected dense mixed forest in spring–summer and dense deciduous forest in late summer – fall. Subadults selected dense deciduous forest, marsh, dense mixed forest, and water during the spring–summer and avoided developed lands and roads. Yearlings selected dense mixed forest, dense deciduous forest, and sparse forests in spring–summer and dense deciduous forest and dense mixed forest in late summer – fall. The selection of dense deciduous and dense mixed forest stands, especially at the broader scale, suggests that strategies to ensure persistence of this isolated population should focus on protecting the integrity of these stands.

2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derrick A. Romain ◽  
Martyn E. Obbard ◽  
James L. Atkinson

We used scat analysis to investigate temporal variation in the food habits of American Black Bears (Ursus americanus) in the boreal forest of northern Ontario. Specifically, we examined whether there was a seasonal shift in foraging over three years (1990–1992) and which foods, if any, varied in occurrence among years. American Black Bears ate foods ranging from green vegetation in the spring to ants in mid-summer and berries and nuts in late summer and fall. Late summer berry forage, especially blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), varied greatly among years. American Black Bears in northern Ontario consumed a variety of foods opportunistically. Understanding how American Black Bears in northern Ontario exploit food resources and how these food items vary among years can provide insights into demographic processes and help wildlife managers better anticipate changes in the structure of the harvest of American Black Bears and in human–bear conflict levels. In northern Ontario, forest management practices that increase the availability of early successional species would be beneficial to American Black Bear populations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 92 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.V. Noyce ◽  
D.L. Garshelis

Solitary, facultative migrating animals must make decisions each year on whether, when, and where to migrate. Factors influencing individuals in their movement choices are poorly understood. American black bears (Ursus americanus Pallas, 1780) commonly migrate in late summer to areas of concentrated foods before winter denning; some bears also move long distances to dens. We radio-tracked seasonal migrations of >200 bears in Minnesota, USA, over 10 years. We observed concurrences in movements that suggested social coordination among individuals, including (i) individuals with neighboring summer ranges traveling to the same distant feeding and (or) denning areas, (ii) shared travel routes with use staggered through time, and (iii) instances of ≥2 individuals traveling in loose tandem over tens of kilometres. We sought to explain the mechanism for these coordinated migrations by comparing our observations to the predictions of six hypotheses: instinct, landscape morphology, habitat gradients, long-distance olfaction, maternal teaching, and conspecific cueing. The most parsimonious explanation was that bears follow other bears, with social cueing likely mediated through chemical communication. Males likely play a key role in social transmission of knowledge of the nutritional landscape via a system of travel routes and information centers that benefits the entire population.


2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 633-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Samson ◽  
Jean Huot

Few studies have examined in detail the spacing patterns of American black bears (Ursus americanus), especially populations protected from hunting. We radio-tracked bears between 1990 and 1992 in La Mauricie National Park in southern Quebec to study their social interactions. We measured the zone of overlap between home-range core areas and evaluated the spatial and temporal use of the overlap zones for 12 adult females radio-tracked during 1992. The proportion of overlap between the core areas used by 22 pairs of females was variable but low (14.2 ± 17.6% (mean ± SD)). This proportion did not differ (p > 0.05) from that obtained from a random distribution of home ranges (17.1 ± 17.1%). For 12 (55%) of 22 pairs with overlapping core areas, at least one of the females was significantly attracted by the overlap zone, whereas one of the females of another pair significantly avoided it. Significant simultaneous use of the overlap zone was observed for 7 pairs and significant temporal avoidance of the overlap zone was noted for 1 pair. The overlap zone contained a significantly higher proportion of food-producing cover types (maple–beech and early-successional stands) than the overall study area. Our results indicate that although most females did not share a large proportion of their core area with their neighbours, the overlap zone was used intensively for foraging by more than one bear, often simultaneously. Some aggressive behaviours were noted when bears were seen foraging simultaneously in the same area. We discuss the influence of spatial and temporal interactions on the regulation of this unhunted population.


Ursus ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie H. Sadeghpour ◽  
Tim F. Ginnett

2010 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
pp. 1403-1413 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.F.C. Brito ◽  
P.L. Sertich ◽  
G.B. Stull ◽  
W. Rives ◽  
M. Knobbe

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Indrani Sasmal ◽  
Nicholas P. Gould ◽  
Krysten L. Schuler ◽  
Yung-Fu Chang ◽  
Anil Thachil ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 570
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Siegal-Willott ◽  
Kendra L. Bauer ◽  
Lee-Ann C. Hayek ◽  
Nicole M. Luensman ◽  
Tangara N. Cross ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document