scholarly journals Simple and Work-Efficient Parallel Algorithms for the Minimum Spanning Tree Problem

1997 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 25-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos D. Zaroliagis

Two Simple and work-efficient parallel algorithms for the minimum spanning tree problem are presented. Both algorithms perform O(m log n) work. The first algorithm runs in O( log 2 n) time on an EREW PRAM, while the second algorithm runs in O( log n) time on a COMMON CRCW PRAM.

1996 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 213-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAOLO FERRAGINA ◽  
FABRIZIO LUCCIO

In this paper we provide three simple techniques to maintain in parallel the minimum spanning tree of an undirected graph under single or batch of edge updates (i.e., insertions and deletions). Our results extend the use of the sparsification data structure to the EREW PRAM model. For proper values of the batch size, our algorithms require less time and work than the best known dynamic parallel algorithms.


1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jungho Park ◽  
Ken'Ichi Hagihara ◽  
Nobuki Tokura ◽  
Toshimitsu Masuzawa

1993 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 79-85
Author(s):  
STEPHAN OLARIU ◽  
WENHUI SHEN ◽  
LARRY WILSON

We show that the Largest Empty Rectangle problem can be solved by reducing it, in a natural way, to the All Nearest Smaller Values problem. We provide two classes of algorithms: the first one assumes that the input points are available sorted by x (resp. y) coordinate. Our algorithm corresponding to this case runs in O(log log n) time using [Formula: see text] processors in the Common-CRCW-PRAM model. For unsorted input, we present algorithms that run in [Formula: see text] time using [Formula: see text] processors in the Common-CRCW-PRAM, or in O( log n) time using [Formula: see text] processors in the EREW-PRAM model. No sub-logarithmic time parallel algorithms have been previously reported for this problem.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document