The Moderating Effect of Industry Concentration on the Relations Between External Attributes and the Properties of Analyst Earnings Forecast

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (03) ◽  
pp. 1350019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Cheng Chen ◽  
Chiung-Yao Huang ◽  
Pei-I Chou
Keyword(s):  
Forecast Accuracy ◽  
Earnings Forecasts ◽  
Moderating Effect ◽  
Industry Concentration ◽  
Earnings Forecast ◽  
Moderating Effects ◽  
Forecast Dispersion ◽  
Earnings Surprise ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Analyst Earnings

Based on the work of earlier studies, the main objective of this study is to determine whether the properties of analyst earnings forecast are related to the interaction effects of external attributes and industry concentration that were not the focus of previous research. Specifically, this study examines the relations between external attributions and the properties of analyst earnings forecasts. Furthermore, we explore the moderating effect of industry concentration on the relations between external attributions and the properties of analyst earnings forecasts. Using data from Compustat and I/B/E/S, we provide evidence that analysts' earnings forecast accuracy is lower and the forecast dispersion is larger for firms with more earnings surprise. Firms with more analysts' forecasts covering are associated with higher forecast accuracy, but not necessarily higher forecast dispersion. The moderating effects of industry concentration on the relationships between earnings surprise, the number of estimates covering the company and forecast accuracy are particularly strong. In addition, the moderating effects of industry concentration on the relationship between earnings surprise, the number of estimates covering the company and the forecast dispersion are partially supported. Overall, the industrial concentration factor either magnifies or alleviates the effect of external attributions on analyst's forecast accuracy and forecast dispersion.

Audit Quality and Properties of Analyst Earnings Forecasts

2008 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce K. Behn ◽  
Jong-Hag Choi ◽  
Tony Kang
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Forecast Accuracy ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Earnings Forecasts ◽  
Earnings Forecast ◽  
Forecast Dispersion ◽  
Industry Specialization ◽  
Big 5 ◽  
Analyst Earnings

Under the assumption that audit quality relates positively to unobservable financial reporting quality, we investigate whether audit quality is associated with the predictability of accounting earnings by focusing on analyst earnings forecast properties. The evidence shows that analysts' earnings forecast accuracy is higher and the forecast dispersion is smaller for firms audited by a Big 5 auditor. We further find that auditor industry specialization is associated with higher forecast accuracy and less forecast dispersion in the non-Big 5 auditor sample but not in the Big 5 auditor sample. Overall, our results suggest that high-quality audit provided by Big 5 auditors and industry specialist non-Big 5 auditors is associated with better forecasting performance by analysts.

I/B/E/S Reported Actual EPS and Analysts' Inferred Actual EPS

2012 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 853-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence D. Brown ◽  
Stephannie Larocque
Keyword(s):  
Majority Rule ◽  
Forecast Accuracy ◽  
Earnings Forecasts ◽  
Analyst Forecast ◽  
Earnings Forecast ◽  
Sample Period ◽  
Forecast Dispersion ◽  
Forecast Revisions ◽  
Earnings Surprises ◽  
Analyst Earnings

ABSTRACT Users of I/B/E/S data generally act as if I/B/E/S reported actual earnings represent the earnings analysts were forecasting when they issued their earnings estimates. For example, when assessing analyst forecast accuracy, users of I/B/E/S data compare analysts' forecasts of EPS with I/B/E/S reported actual EPS. I/B/E/S states that it calculates actuals using a “majority rule,” indicating that its actuals often do not represent the earnings that all individual analysts were forecasting. We introduce a method for measuring analyst inferred actuals, and we assess how often I/B/E/S actuals do not represent analyst inferred actuals. We find that I/B/E/S reported Q1 actual EPS differs from analyst inferred actual Q1 EPS by at least one penny 39 percent of the time during our sample period, 36.5 percent of the time when only one analyst follows the firm (hence, this consensus forecast is based on the “majority rule”), and 50 percent of the time during the last three years of our sample period. We document two adverse consequences of this phenomenon. First, studies failing to recognize that I/B/E/S EPS actuals often differ from analyst inferred actuals are likely to obtain less accurate analyst earnings forecasts, smaller analyst earnings forecast revisions conditional on earnings surprises, greater analyst forecast dispersion, and smaller market reaction to earnings surprises than do studies adjusting for these differences. Second, studies failing to recognize that I/B/E/S EPS actuals often differ from analyst inferred actuals may make erroneous inferences.

Discussion: “Dispersion in Analysts' Earnings Forecasts as a Measure of Uncertainty”

1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence D. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Stock Price ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Earnings Forecasts ◽  
Analyst Forecast ◽  
Earnings Forecast ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Forecast Dispersion ◽  
Forecast Revision ◽  
Analyst Earnings ◽  
The Impact

This paper tackles an interesting question; namely, whether dispersion in analysts' earnings forecasts reflects uncertainty about firms' future economic performance. It improves on the extant literature in three ways. First, it uses detailed analyst earnings forecast data to estimate analyst forecast dispersion and revision. The contrasting evidence of Morse, Stephan, and Stice (1991) and Brown and Han (1992), who respectively used consensus and detailed analyst data to examine the impact of earnings announcements on forecast dispersion, suggest that detailed data are preferable for determining the data set on which analysts' forecasts are conditioned. Second, it relates forecast dispersion to both analyst earnings forecast revision and stock price reaction to the subsequent earnings announcement. Previous studies related forecast dispersion to either analyst forecast revision (e.g., Stickel 1989) or to subsequent stock price movements (e.g., Daley et al. [1988]), but not to both revision and returns. Third, it includes the interim quarters along with the annual report. In contrast, previous research focused on the annual report, ignoring the interims (Daley et al. [1988]).

Auditor Governance, Institutions and Analyst Forecast Properties: International Evidence

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnt J. M. Verriest
Keyword(s):  
Audit Quality ◽  
Investor Protection ◽  
Forecast Accuracy ◽  
Earnings Forecasts ◽  
Earnings Forecast ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Forecast Dispersion ◽  
Big 4 ◽  
Political Forces ◽  
Governance Institutions

ABSTRACT This paper investigates how political and legal institutions affect the governance role of auditors for a sample of firms originating in 42 countries. Prior studies focus on investor protection, but I focus on political rights as well. Specifically, I investigate how institutions and audit quality affect financial statement users' decision-making by considering properties of analysts' earnings forecasts. The evidence shows that forecast accuracy is lower and forecast dispersion higher for firms operating in countries with fewer political rights. Of particular interest is the finding that the association between Big 4 audits and earnings forecast properties is stronger in weak political environments. This finding suggests that auditors play an important—and up to now undocumented—governance role when political rights are low and political forces influential. My results also indicate that reporting reliability increases as investor protection becomes stronger. However, this result only holds for Big 4 clients, consistent with the notion that audits play a greater governance role in stronger legal environments.

scholarly journals Political Patronage, Audit Quality and the Properties of Analysts' Earnings Forecasts in Malaysia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willie E. Gist ◽  
Effiezal Aswadi Abdul Wahab
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Forecast Accuracy ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Earnings Forecasts ◽  
Earnings Forecast ◽  
Forecast Dispersion ◽  
Political Patronage

Based on a sample of 2,034 Malaysian listed firm-year observations for the period 2007-2014, this study shows a negative relationship between dimensions of political patronage (i.e., politically connected firms and the percentage of Bumiputera directors) and analysts' earnings forecast accuracy. Furthermore, the study documents a positive relationship between Bumiputera directors and earnings forecast dispersion. These results suggest that the political patronage of firms is associated with low-quality earnings. We also find that measures of high audit quality are associated with high financial reporting quality and that this is evident in firms with high audit quality showing a weaker negative (positive) relationship between forecast accuracy (dispersion) and political connections and high levels of Bumiputera directors. Overall, the findings suggest that high audit quality plays an important role in mitigating agency costs of information asymmetry by improving the financial information environment.

Do Analysts Say Anything About Earnings Without Revising Their Earnings Forecasts?

2018 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip G. Berger ◽  
Charles G. Ham ◽  
Zachary R. Kaplan
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Forecasts ◽  
Share Price ◽  
Earnings Forecast ◽  
Forecast Dispersion ◽  
Earnings Announcement ◽  
Forecast Revisions ◽  
Predictable Returns

ABSTRACT Analysts are selective about which forecasts they update and, thus, convey information about current quarter earnings even when not revising the current quarter earnings (CQE) forecast. We find that (1) textual statements, (2) share price target revisions, and (3) future quarter earnings forecast revisions all predict error in the CQE forecast. We document several reasons analysts sometimes omit information from the CQE forecast: to facilitate beatable forecasts by suppressing positive news from the CQE forecast, to herd toward the consensus, and to avoid small forecast revisions. We also show that omitting information from CQE forecasts leads to lower forecast dispersion and predictable returns at the earnings announcement.

An Empirical Test of the Signaling Effect of Management's Earnings Forecasts: A Decomposition of the Earnings Surprise and Forecast Surprise Effects

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gillian Hian Heng Yeo ◽  
David A. Ziebart
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Market Reaction ◽  
Empirical Test ◽  
Earnings Forecasts ◽  
The Other ◽  
Earnings Forecast ◽  
Corporate Management ◽  
Management Earnings Forecasts ◽  
Market Reactions ◽  
Earnings Surprise

When corporate management issues an earnings forecast there are potentially two surprises. One potential surprise is that a forecast was issued and the other is the surprise in the earnings forecast. Accordingly, the observed stock market reaction to management earnings forecasts may be due to one or the other, or both. This study decomposes the cross-sectional variability in stock market reactions to management earnings forecasts into the portions attributable to the forecast surprise and the earnings surprise. The results indicate that the market's reaction is a function of both the earnings surprise and the forecast surprise. However, the market reaction is more associated with forecast surprise than with the earnings surprise. This suggests that results in previous studies on the market reactions to management earnings forecasts may need to be reconsidered.

scholarly journals Earnings Forecast Optimism For U.S. Vs. Non-U.S. Firms

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1491
Author(s):  
David Salerno ◽  
Nathan Jeppson
Keyword(s):  
Task Complexity ◽  
Financial Analysts ◽  
Forecast Accuracy ◽  
Earnings Forecasts ◽  
International Investment ◽  
Growth Potential ◽  
Earnings Forecast ◽  
Level Measurement ◽  
Investment Opportunities

This study examines whether financial analysts are more optimistic in their earnings forecasts for non-U.S. firms than they are for U.S. firms. Several areas of research motivate this examination. First, research shows that global economic influences, such as economic downturns and the desire to increase the international content of portfolios, encourage investors to seek out international investment opportunities in new markets. Second, literature also reveals that emerging markets provide superior growth potential; however, analyzing such firms could introduce task complexity which research finds to be associated with lower forecast accuracy. Finally, research shows that financial analysts cover firms of which they have a favorable opinion. Therefore, because of this literature, it is reasonable to expect that analysts make more optimistic forecasts (over-estimate errors) of the earnings potential of the non-U.S. firms that they choose to follow vs. U.S. firms. Using a summary level measurement of forecast optimism, the authors find that analysts forecasts are more optimistic for non-U.S. firms over both short and long-term horizons. In analyst-level tests, it was found that individual analysts produce more optimistic forecasts for non-U.S. firms in relation to their peers in the long-term; however, that optimism is reduced under short horizons. As portfolios become more internationally diversified, the result of this study will be useful to investors seeking analyst guidance about international investment opportunities.

The informativeness of impression management − financial analysts and rhetorical style of CEO letters

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 462-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beibei Yan ◽  
Walter Aerts ◽  
James Thewissen
Keyword(s):  
Impression Management ◽  
Financial Analysts ◽  
Forecast Accuracy ◽  
Earnings Forecasts ◽  
Earnings Forecast ◽  
Management Communication ◽  
Self Presentation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Rhetorical Features ◽  
Occurrence Patterns

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the informativeness of rhetorical impression management patterns of CEO letters and examines whether these rhetorical features affect financial analysts’ forecasting behaviour. Design/methodology/approach The authors use textual analysis on a sample of 526 CEO letters of US firms and apply factor analysis on individual linguistic style measures to identify co-occurrence patterns of style features. Findings The authors identify three holistic style patterns (assertive acclaiming, cautious plausibility-based framing and logic-based rationalizing) and find that assertive rhetorical feature in CEO letters is negatively related with the dispersion of financial analysts’ earnings forecasts and positively associated with earnings forecast accuracy. CEOs’ use of a rationalizing rhetorical pattern tends to decrease the dispersion of financial analysts’ earnings, whereas a cautious plausibility-based rhetorical position is only marginally instrumental in getting more accurate earnings predictions. Practical implications Whilst impression management communication is often theorized as manipulative and void of real information content, the findings suggest that impression management serves both self-presentation and information-sharing purposes. Originality/value This paper elaborates on the co-occurrence of style characteristics in management communication and is a first attempt to validate the external ramifications of holistic style profiles of corporate narratives by focusing on an economic target audience.

Absolute Forecast Errors of Earnings in Malaysian IPO Prospectuses: The Impact of Ethnic Diversity

2014 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Abdullah Ammer ◽  
Nurwati A. Ahmad-Zaluki
Keyword(s):  
Ethnic Diversity ◽  
Boards Of Directors ◽  
Forecast Error ◽  
Forecast Accuracy ◽  
Earnings Forecasts ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Earnings Forecast ◽  
Forecast Errors ◽  
The Impact

The main focus of this paper is the earnings forecast, a vital information included in IPO prospectus. Specifically, our paper examined the impact of ethnic diversity groups on the boards of directors and audit committees in terms of earnings forecast accuracy. We are motivated by the lack of prior studies related to investigating IPO earnings forecast. Cross-sectional Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) modeling was conducted on 190 Malaysian IPOs from 2002 to 2012. For the evaluation of earnings forecast accuracy, we mathematically used the metric of Absolute Forecast Error (AFER). Moreover, for the test of robustness, we used the metric of Squared Forecast Error (SQFER) as error measurement, as it mostly deals with large errors. The empirical results indicate that the ethnic diversity groups on boards and audit committees have an impact on the accuracy of earnings forecasts. However, the evidence is significant for Chinese and Malay serving on boards but insignificant in terms of Chinese and Malay serving on audit committee. The findings indicate that multi-ethnic groups in Malaysian IPO companies could hinder the capability of IPO companies to achieve accurate earnings forecasts in their prospectuses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document