scholarly journals Intersection algebras for principal monomial ideals in polynomial rings

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (07) ◽  
pp. 1550108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Enescu ◽  
Sara Malec

The properties of the intersection algebra of two principal monomial ideals in a polynomial ring are investigated in detail. Results are obtained regarding the Hilbert series and the canonical ideal of the intersection algebra using methods from the theory of Diophantine linear equations with integer coefficients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 485 ◽  
pp. 353-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Krone ◽  
Anton Leykin ◽  
Andrew Snowden

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-226
Author(s):  
Azeem Haider ◽  
Sardar Khan

Let S = K[x1,…,xn] be a polynomial ring in n variables over a field K. Stanley’s conjecture holds for the modules I and S/I, when I ⊂ S is a critical monomial ideal. We calculate the Stanley depth of S/I when I is a canonical critical monomial ideal. For non-critical monomial ideals we show the existence of a Stanley ideal with the same depth and Hilbert function.


2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-240
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Bergen

AbstractWe classify the affine actions of Uq(sl(2)) on commutative polynomial rings in m ≥ 1 variables. We show that, up to scalar multiplication, there are two possible actions. In addition, for each action, the subring of invariants is a polynomial ring in either m or m−1 variables, depending upon whether q is or is not a root of 1.


10.37236/6783 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchel T. Keller ◽  
Stephen J. Young

We develop combinatorial tools to study the relationship between the Stanley depth of a monomial ideal $I$ and the Stanley depth of its compliment, $S/I$. Using these results we are able to prove that if $S$ is a polynomial ring with at most 5 indeterminates and $I$ is a square-free monomial ideal, then the Stanley depth of $S/I$ is strictly larger than the Stanley depth of $I$. Using a computer search, we are able to extend this strict inequality up to polynomial rings with at most 7 indeterminates. This partially answers questions asked by Propescu and Qureshi as well as Herzog.


Author(s):  
Yubin Gao

Let [Formula: see text] be a polynomial ring in [Formula: see text] variables over a field [Formula: see text]. When [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are monomial ideals of [Formula: see text] generated by powers of the variables [Formula: see text], it is proved that [Formula: see text]. If [Formula: see text], the same result for the product of a finite number of ideals as above is proved.


2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 609-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Nasr-Isfahani

AbstractWe provide necessary and sufficient conditions for a skew polynomial ring of derivation type to be semiprimitive when the base ring has no nonzero nil ideals. This extends existing results on the Jacobson radical of skew polynomial rings of derivation type.


2019 ◽  
Vol 293 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-146
Author(s):  
Lukas Katthän ◽  
Julio José Moyano‐Fernández ◽  
Jan Uliczka

Author(s):  
D. D. Anderson ◽  
Ranthony A. C. Edmonds

Given a certain factorization property of a ring [Formula: see text], we can ask if this property extends to the polynomial ring over [Formula: see text] or vice versa. For example, it is well known that [Formula: see text] is a unique factorization domain if and only if [Formula: see text] is a unique factorization domain. If [Formula: see text] is not a domain, this is no longer true. In this paper, we survey unique factorization in commutative rings with zero divisors, and characterize when a polynomial ring over an arbitrary commutative ring has unique factorization.


2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weixing Chen

It is proved that there exists an NI ring R over which the polynomial ring R[x] is not an NLI ring. This answers an open question of Qu and Wei (Stud. Sci. Math. Hung., 51(2), 2014) in the negative. Moreover a sufficient condition of R[x] to be an NLI ring is included for an NLI ring R.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document