THE EFFECTIVE BENCHMARK SELECTION MODEL AND SIMULATION IN THE POWER SECTOR OF CHINA’S ETS

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (03) ◽  
pp. 2041006
Author(s):  
SHAOZHOU QI ◽  
ANQI HE ◽  
JIHONG ZHANG

In 2019, the National Carbon Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) of China’s power generation industry was officially launched, and the free allocation and benchmark are the primary ways for allowance allocation in the first phase of the national ETS. The carbon allowance allocation method is the basis for the effective operation of the ETS. In order to evaluate China’s carbon allowance allocation method published by policy, we constructed a selection model of the effective benchmark and combined with three different scenarios such as no generation-right trading market, incomplete generation-right trading market and complete generation-right trading market to simulate the operation of the national ETS in China’s power generation industry. The study shows that: (1) according to the current benchmark value published by policy, the carbon allowance supply will exceed demand in all scenarios. (2) Regardless of the scenario, in order to balance the supply and demand of allowance in the ETS, the effective benchmark value should be adjusted to 35th–50th quantile of the carbon emissions per unit power generation.

2012 ◽  
Vol 487 ◽  
pp. 94-98
Author(s):  
Tung Sheng Zhan

This paper proposed an issue aiming at the goal of pierces the relationship between the emission trading scheme and dynamic economic dispatch (DED) problem for the electricity utility. A model of the CO2 emission trading market will be investigated and introduced into DED problem incorporating wind power plant and independent power providers (IPPs). Then, an accelerated particle swarm optimization (APSO) algorithm is introduced in order to avoid prematurity convergence of the original PSO and improve searching efficiency. Thus, APSO was used to determine the DED strategy of the utility with incorporation of wind power generation and contribution of IPPs. The CO2 emission trading is treated as the inner-cost, and the superfluous CO2 quotas will be resale into the market, whereas the shortage quotas can be purchased from the market.


2016 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 902-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingjing Jiang ◽  
Dejun Xie ◽  
Bin Ye ◽  
Bo Shen ◽  
Zhanming Chen

2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Yang ◽  
Hanfeng Liao ◽  
Xiaoying Feng ◽  
Xingcai Yao

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document