ELUCIDATING EQUITY PREMIUM USING CORPORATE DIVIDENDS AND HABIT FORMATION

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 1550014
Author(s):  
JOW-RAN CHANG ◽  
HSU-HSIEN CHU

This paper extends Longstaff and Piazzesi (2004, Journal of Financial Economics, 74, 401–421.) to a habit formation model. By combining corporate fraction ratio, and surplus consumption ratio, we derive closed-form solutions for stock values when dividends, habit ratio and consumption follow exponential affine jump-diffusion processes. We can prove that Longstaff and Piazzesi (2004) is only a special case of our model. In addition, calibrated results show that the corporate fraction and habit ratio to shocks significantly increases the equity premium and decreases the risk-free rate. The model determines realistic values for the equity premium and the risk-free rate.

1996 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. 1135-1171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Bansal ◽  
Wilbur John Coleman

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 93-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
YINGDONG LV ◽  
BERNHARD K. MEISTER

In this paper, we study the Kelly criterion in the continuous time framework building on the work of E.O. Thorp and others. The existence of an optimal strategy is proven in a general setting and the corresponding optimal wealth process is found. A simple formula is provided for calculating the optimal portfolio in terms of drift, short term risk-free rate and correlations for a set of generic multi-dimensional diffusion processes satisfying some simple conditions. Properties of the optimal investment strategy are studied. The paper ends with a short discussion of the implications of these ideas for financial markets.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 139
Author(s):  
George M. Mukupa ◽  
Elias R. Offen ◽  
Edward M. Lungu

In this paper, we study the risk averse investor's equilibrium equity premium in a semi martingale market with arbitrary jumps. We realize that,  if we normalize the market, the equilibrium equity premium is consistent to taking the risk free rate $\rho=0$ in martingale markets. We also observe that the value process affects both the diffusive and rare-event premia except for the CARA negative exponential utility function. The bond price always affect the diffusive risk premium for this risk averse investor.


2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 1950003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianjun Miao ◽  
Bin Wei ◽  
Hao Zhou

This paper offers an ambiguity-based interpretation of the variance premium — the difference between risk-neutral and objective expectations of market return variance — as a compounding effect of both belief distortion and variance differential regarding the uncertain economic regimes. Our calibrated model can match the variance premium, the equity premium, and the risk-free rate in the data. We find that about 97% of the mean–variance premium can be attributed to ambiguity aversion. A three-way separation among ambiguity aversion, risk aversion, and intertemporal substitution, permitted by the smooth ambiguity preferences, plays a key role in our model’s quantitative performance.


2000 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen G Cecchetti ◽  
Pok-Sang Lam ◽  
Nelson C Mark

We study a Lucas asset-pricing model that is standard in all respects, except that the representative agent's subjective beliefs about endowment growth are distorted. Using constant relative risk-aversion (CRRA) utility, with a CRRA coefficient below 10; fluctuating beliefs that exhibit, on average, excessive pessimism over expansions; and excessive optimism over contractions (both ending more quickly than the data suggest), our model is able to match the first and second moments of the equity premium and risk-free rate, as well as the persistence and predictability of excess returns found in the data. (JEL E44, G12)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document