Helping high-needs schools prioritize CS education through teacher advocacy & experiences

ACM Inroads ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph P. Wilson ◽  
Melissa Moritz

2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 875-899
Author(s):  
Meredith W. Kier ◽  
Jason A. Chen


2008 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. 766-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barnett Berry


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 292-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry T. Mitchell ◽  
George Roy ◽  
Stephannie Fritch ◽  
Brandy Wood




2017 ◽  
Vol 119 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-58
Author(s):  
Vicki S. Collet

Background Federal and state accountability policies attempt to improve educational outcomes but have been blamed for a breadth of ills, including minimizing local knowledge and reducing teachers’ ability to respond to contextual needs. Teachers in high-needs schools, especially, feel the effects of constrained curricula and increased testing, resulting in increased workload and anxiety. Purpose This article explores the impact of professional development on teachers and students in a time of high-stakes accountability. Specifically, we ask: Does Lesson Study impact teachers’ instruction and students’ achievement in writing? And how do pressures imposed by policy impact efficacy and collaboration in a high-needs school? Research Design This study uses data from 20 Lesson Study meetings at a high-needs, “Turnaround” school and considers changes in students’ writing achievement. The mixed-method approach and high-stakes context offer a unique contribution to Lesson Study research. Conclusions Findings indicate that instruction changed and students’ writing significantly improved, with the mean growth percentile increasing from the 30th to the 46th percentile on state assessments. Further, we found that during the Lesson Study process, teachers moved through six Stages of Transformation in response to a high-pressure context, moving from feelings of anger and blame-shifting to eventual feelings of empowerment.



2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 642-670
Author(s):  
Elise Swanson ◽  
Gary Ritter

One of the greatest challenges faced by school leaders across the United States is the recruitment of high-quality educators, and many programs have been developed to address this problem. This study evaluates one such program. We evaluate the Arkansas Teacher Corps (ATC), an alternative teacher certification program that places teachers in high-needs schools in Arkansas. We measure teacher effectiveness through classroom observations and student surveys. We form our comparison group by matching ATC Fellows with 1–2 similar teachers in the same school who were not certified through ATC. We use multivariate regression to examine differences between ATC Fellows and comparison teachers on multiple dimensions of teaching. Students rate ATC teachers as significantly more effective on teacher-student relationships in class, teacher-student relationships out of class, and class engagement. Third-party observers detect no significant differences.



2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 768-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans W. Klar ◽  
Curtis A. Brewer




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document