Learning Styles, Teaching Strategies and Academic Performance: Triangular Basis for a Faculty Development Program in Nursing Curriculum and Instruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicisimo Enriquez Santiago ◽  
Ponpun Vorasiha ◽  
Boonsri Kittichottipanich
Keyword(s):  
Academic Performance ◽  
Faculty Development ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Teaching Strategies ◽  
Curriculum And Instruction ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Nursing Curriculum ◽  
Faculty Development Program

Object-Oriented Faculty Development

2010 ◽  
pp. 517-532
Author(s):  
Karen Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Human Performance ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Object Oriented ◽  
Teaching Tool ◽  
Development Programs ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Performance Training ◽  
Training Professionals

The study outlined in this chapter simulated a faculty development program that utilized a demonstration/ simulation -- a learning object that digitally demonstrates a task then asks the student to replicate it. In this learning environment, participants were given the chance to learn a skill from a teaching tool that they in turn could use in their classrooms. In addition, half the participants were asked to evaluate their learning styles by taking a Multiple Intelligence inventory before working with the demonstration/ simulation. Overall, the participants felt that this study was an enlightening experience for them -- they became more aware of how they learn, which gave them insight on how their students learn. Faculty development designers, human performance training professionals, and instructional technology designers can use the results of this study to gain a greater understanding of object-oriented faculty development programs that improve human performance and appropriate ways to implement them.

scholarly journals Evaluation of a Faculty Development Program Aimed at Increasing Residents' Active Learning in Lectures

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 516-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie C. Desselle ◽  
Robin English ◽  
George Hescock ◽  
Andrea Hauser ◽  
Melissa Roy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Faculty Development ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Teaching Strategies ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Intervention Phase ◽  
Active Learning Strategies ◽  
Item Scale

Abstract Background Active engagement in the learning process is important to enhance learners' knowledge acquisition and retention and the development of their thinking skills. This study evaluated whether a 1-hour faculty development workshop increased the use of active teaching strategies and enhanced residents' active learning and thinking. Methods Faculty teaching in a pediatrics residency participated in a 1-hour workshop (intervention) approximately 1 month before a scheduled lecture. Participants' responses to a preworkshop/postworkshop questionnaire targeted self-efficacy (confidence) for facilitating active learning and thinking and providing feedback about workshop quality. Trained observers assessed each lecture (3-month baseline phase and 3-month intervention phase) using an 8-item scale for use of active learning strategies and a 7-item scale for residents' engagement in active learning. Observers also assessed lecturer-resident interactions and the extent to which residents were asked to justify their answers. Results Responses to the workshop questionnaire (n  =  32/34; 94%) demonstrated effectiveness and increased confidence. Faculty in the intervention phase demonstrated increased use of interactive teaching strategies for 6 items, with 5 reaching statistical significance (P ≤ .01). Residents' active learning behaviors in lectures were higher in the intervention arm for all 7 items, with 5 reaching statistical significance. Faculty in the intervention group demonstrated increased use of higher-order questioning (P  =  .02) and solicited justifications for answers (P  =  .01). Conclusion A 1-hour faculty development program increased faculty use of active learning strategies and residents' engagement in active learning during resident core curriculum lectures.

47. Evaluation of new implementation strategies, program effectiveness and dissemination of new pedagogical knowledge: Centre for faculty development's stepping stones teaching certificate program

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
D. Richardson ◽  
I. Silver ◽  
A. Dionne
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Faculty Development ◽  
Program Effectiveness ◽  
Teaching Practice ◽  
Journal Club ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Stepping Stones ◽  
Certificate Program ◽  
The Impact

This evaluation of the integrated Stepping Stones (SS) Teaching Certificate program, including its instructional development (workshops) and theory review (journal club) components, will inform further program development. Results of this project will also add to the limited amount of scholarly work in the area of faculty development program evaluation. Faculty development literature in the area of organized program assessment reveals use of either quantitative OR qualitative methods. In this project, a novel method combining both techniques was used to explore program impact. Participants completed 2 questionnaires to identify skill-set knowledge gaps in teaching effectiveness. Pre- and post-program quantitative gaps were generated. Focus groups were used for qualitative exploration. Areas explored pre-program included: a) motives for enrollment, b) program expectations and c) prior teaching preparation. Post-program discussion explored: the impact of the program on a) participant’s perceived gaps, b) teaching behaviour change, and c) its influence on their career in education. We believed the program’s interprofessional environment would foster development of a learning community having impact on faculty knowledge, skills and attitudes related to teaching, and potentially elicit behavioural change in teaching practices. Results from a 2004-2005 cohort of participants have identified a variety of benefits for faculty and their teaching practice. Results from a second separate cohort, 2005-2006 participants, validated the initial findings. Remarkable harmonization in the results of the qualitative analysis between the two cohort samples was evident. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in each of the domains examined qualitatively. Both qualitative and quantitatively, program effectiveness was demonstrated immediately following completion of the program. Follow up to assess the sustainability of the effects is ongoing. The analysis of the quantitative discrepancy (gaps) data has lead to a possible technique to assist in identifying unperceived educational needs. McLeod PJ, Steinert Y, Nasmith L, Conochie L. Faculty Development in Canadian medical schools: a 10-year update. CMAJ 1997; 156(10):1419-23. Hewson MG, Copeland HL, Fishleder AJ. What’s the use of faculty development? Program evaluation using retrospective self-assessments and independent performance ratings. Teach Learn Med 2001; 13(3):153-60. Moore EM. A Framework for Outcomes Evaluation in the Continuing Development of Physicians, in: The Continuing Professional Development of Physicians. Eds. Davis D, Barnes BE, Fox R. AMA Press, 2003.

scholarly journals Outcomes of a national faculty development program in teaching skills

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1220-1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas K. Houston ◽  
Jeanne M. Clark ◽  
Rachel B. Levine ◽  
Gary S. Ferenchick ◽  
Judith L. Bowen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Teaching Skills ◽  
Faculty Development Program

scholarly journals A Faculty Development Program to Train Tutors to Be Discussion Leaders Rather Than Facilitators

2007 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 486-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen M. Shields ◽  
Daniel Guss ◽  
Samuel C. Somers ◽  
B Price Kerfoot ◽  
Brian S. Mandell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Faculty Development Program

scholarly journals The impact of a faculty development program, the Leadership in Academic Medicine Program (LAMP), on self-efficacy, academic promotion and institutional retention

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Tung ◽  
Musarrat Nahid ◽  
Mangala Rajan ◽  
Lia Logio
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Academic Rank ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Institutional Retention ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Academic medical centers invest considerably in faculty development efforts to support the career success and promotion of their faculty, and to minimize faculty attrition. This study evaluated the impact of a faculty development program called the Leadership in Academic Medicine Program (LAMP) on participants’ (1) self-ratings of efficacy, (2) promotion in academic rank, and (3) institutional retention. Method Participants from the 2013–2020 LAMP cohorts were surveyed pre and post program to assess their level of agreement with statements that spanned domains of self-awareness, self-efficacy, satisfaction with work and work environment. Pre and post responses were compared using McNemar’s tests. Changes in scores across gender were compared using Wilcoxon Rank Sum/Mann-Whitney tests. LAMP participants were matched to nonparticipant controls by gender, rank, department, and time of hire to compare promotions in academic rank and departures from the organization. Kaplan Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine differences. Results There were significant improvements in almost all self-ratings on program surveys (p < 0.05). Greatest improvements were seen in “understand the promotions process” (36% vs. 94%), “comfortable negotiating” (35% vs. 74%), and “time management” (55% vs. 92%). There were no statistically significant differences in improvements by gender, however women faculty rated themselves lower on all pre-program items compared to men. There was significant difference found in time-to-next promotion (p = 0.003) between LAMP participants and controls. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that LAMP faculty achieved next promotion more often and faster than controls. Cox-proportional-hazards analyses found that LAMP faculty were 61% more likely to be promoted than controls (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16–2.23, p-value = 0.004). There was significant difference found in time-to-departure (p < 0.0001) with LAMP faculty retained more often and for longer periods. LAMP faculty were 77% less likely to leave compared to controls (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.16–0.34, p < 0.0001). Conclusions LAMP is an effective faculty development program as measured subjectively by participant self-ratings and objectively through comparative improvements in academic promotions and institutional retention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document